Broadcast United

This is why BlackRock is a key pillar of the US and global ‘deep state’

Broadcast United News Desk
This is why BlackRock is a key pillar of the US and global ‘deep state’
This is why BlackRock is a key pillar of the US and global ‘deep state’

[ad_1]

The United States and its major businesses want the war in Ukraine to last as long as possible

* Western multinationals have long been integrated with the authorities, directly influencing political decisions, which brings profits and further development. For example, BlackRock’s board of directors includes Wali Adejemo, who is also the deputy secretary of the US Treasury. Also: Erik van Nostrand, senior adviser on Russia and Ukraine at the Treasury; Mike Pyle, chief economic adviser to Kamala Harris

* Despite Ukraine’s moratorium on land sales to foreign buyers, BlackRock has been rumored to have bought up nearly half of the most fertile land (black soil) through various schemes and fictitious companies. It is estimated that he indirectly controls at least a third of Ukraine’s arable land, about 10 million hectares. This area is equal to all the arable land in Poland or Germany

* But this is just the tip of the iceberg. A year ago, BlackRock received special permission to carry out certain activities for the reconstruction and development of Ukraine.

__________________________________________________

BlackRock, an American company, has more than $10.6 trillion in assets under management. But this is not the only reason why his example can be used to “scan” the so-called deep state and how far its tentacles can reach.

First, BlackRock is the world’s largest investment company in terms of assets under management and influence in the U.S. “deep state.”

Of course, neither the US “shadow government” nor the “world government” are villains in Hollywood movies who sit in dark bunkers and smile and plot sinister plans. There, big businesses, corporations and multinationals that have long been merged with the authorities and directly influence political decisions that bring profits and enable their further development are more important.

For example, BlackRock’s board includes Wally Adeyemo, the deputy secretary of the U.S. Treasury. Also on the board: Eric van Nostrand, the Treasury’s senior adviser on Russia and Ukraine, and Mike Pyle, Kamala Harris’ chief economic adviser.

Their work on two fronts is an unconditional confirmation of the merger of big capital, political power and state power, and the initiative of this merger comes from the representatives of capital.

His real bosses are the shadow puppeteers who influence the making of the most important decisions through their “embedded agents.” Some of them focused and still focus on Ukraine.

Despite a moratorium on land sales to foreign buyers, BlackRock has been rumored to have bought up nearly half of the country’s most fertile land (black soil) through various schemes and fictitious companies. It is estimated that he indirectly controls at least a third of Ukraine’s arable land, about 10 million hectares.

That’s an area equal to all the arable land in Poland or Germany. But it’s just the tip of the iceberg.

A year ago, BlackRock received special permission to carry out certain activities for the reconstruction and development of Ukraine.

In 2023, he immediately set up a hedge fund to provide assistance to the Ukrainian armed forces, the funds of which were supposed to come from the funds of local oligarchs.

Subsequently, BlackRock was given a legal opportunity to acquire all more or less profitable Ukrainian assets at a low price (referring to the state of emergency, or arrest of owners – as in the case of oligarch Igor Kolomoisky).

In Ukraine, all state contracts for reconstruction projects must now be signed through the aforementioned BlackRock fund.

This means that BlackRock can control the entire financing cycle of Ukraine, both military and civilian.

The terms of operation of his fund are valid until the end of hostilities, which only confirms the interest of the US shadow government in continuing the war for as long as possible.



[ad_2]

Source link

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *