[ad_1]
The man denied guilt in his actions.
North Karelia The couple’s semi-detached apartment had been suffering from unexplained water problems for more than a year. Often there was little water coming out of the taps, and eventually none at all.
A neighbouring man was found to be the culprit and admitted he had restricted the couple’s access to water due to moisture issues.
The couple moved into a semi-detached house in the North Karelia countryside in 2019. The following year, a 70-year-old man moved in next door.
In early autumn of 2021, the couple’s water supply began to be guaranteed. The water supply was sometimes more and sometimes less, making life difficult for the couple.
For example, they had to go elsewhere to wash their clothes during the following winter. Even bathing was difficult as water only came from the tap. Bathing sometimes required collecting water in a bucket, the woman told the local court.
in autumn In 2022, the water supply was completely cut off. The couple had to evacuate to their son in western Finland.
Waterworks workers said there was no pressure at all in the water pipes to the couple’s apartment.
The suspect focused on a man who lived next door. After the police visited the man, the couple’s water supply finally returned to normal in October 2022.
During questioning, the man admitted that he regulated his neighbor’s water supply through a valve in his own apartment.
– Those neighbors used too much cold water, and that pipe that went through my toilet, that pipe sweated a lot and leaked onto the walls and floor. “My toilet was really wet,” the man said during the interrogation.
The man denied guilt in his actions.
– I know the lock controls the neighbor’s water supply. But when my toilet is leaking a lot of condensation from the sweaty pipes, I have to control it.
District Attorney The North Karelia Regional Court was asked to punish the man for having built the house with his own hands, but the man denied this. He appealed to the lack of technology in the semi-detached house.
The local court sentenced the man to a fine of 12 euros for 60 days, which translates to a total fine of 720 euros.
– The court said that the defendants’ proceedings had lasted for more than a year, making it more difficult for the owners concerned to live in their apartments.
The court held that this was not a short-term and necessary water restriction for the purpose of taking corrective action and that the man was entitled to take corrective action on his own.
The District Court ordered the man to pay the couple a total of €3,298 in damages and a further €1,909 in legal costs.
The decision is not legally binding and can be appealed to the Eastern Finland Court of Appeal.
[ad_2]
Source link
