[ad_1]
The second discussion of the bill was completed by the competent parliamentary committee following positive comments and suggestions from the competent extra-parliamentary bodies (which had been invited to submit comments). Ministry of Justiceit’s about him Modernization of the Council of State and tHigh version of judicial decision.
However, the meeting featured the Attorney General; George Floridis and Freedom of Navigation Chair, Zoe Constantopoulou.
This incident was the intervention of Mrs. Constantopoulou at the institutional hearing, where she requested Withdraw the billcondemning the leadership of the Ministry of Justice for “inadequate and substantive consultation with all relevant agencies,” “fast-tracking parliamentary procedures” and “violations of human rights and the rule of law.”
Mr. Floridis reacted strongly, objecting that “the bill had been negotiated for 23 days, all those who were truly interested in the new regulations submitted their opinions, and it was decided by the plenary session of the European Commission to adopt it.”
“If we say we respect democracy and institutions, we must respect them. Let us respect the highest procedure, which is consultation,” stressed Mr. Floridis, while accusing Ms. Konstantopoulou of violating the Rules of Procedure.
Mr Floridis added: “Bowling is unacceptable to us.” This prompted a response from Ms Konstantopoulou, who addressed the ridiculous reports about the consultation, adding that “the rule of law is not limited to what anyone sees, sees or owes knowledge”.
“Parliamentary rules were flagrantly violated. Today’s meeting was a meeting of a non-parliamentary body. For the first time in the history of Parliament, there was interference in an institutional hearing,” said ND General Rapporteur Athanasios Zambilis.
Opinions of various institutions
Panagiotis Tsoukas, president of the Union of Judicial Officers of the Council of State, expressed his positive attitude towards the bill and spoke of the most important reforms carried out since the creation of the Council of State.
As he stressed, “the new legislative initiative aims to rationalize and address the causes, the basic logic of which is to change the annulment procedure and solve the problem of long delays in judicial decisions”.
Mr. Soukas stressed that “the Ministry of Justice consulted very well with all the judges, with the main aim of conducting a serious trial diligently and in a short period of time.”
Dimitris Tsarouhas, a member of the board of directors of the Union of Judicial Officials of the Supreme Court, expressed reservations about the feasibility of the provision for parties to digitally authorize their lawyers.
Vassilis Papageorgiou, a representative of the Athens Bar Association, strongly criticized the bill, stressing that “since these provisions are proposed in the context of the annulment of trials, they appear contradictory and hasty, inconsistent with the purpose of the reform, the acceleration of the procedure”.
He also spoke of fragmented regulations, stifling deadlines and shaky standards for revocation proceedings.
Thanasis Makrygiannis, president of the Lamia Bar Association and deputy to the plenary session of the Greek Bar Association, also expressed opposition to the bill, which he believes reduces the ability to appeal and imposes restrictions on it. In terms of exercising judicial rights, procedural rights are restricted, but serious problems such as long delays in decision-making are not addressed.
Georgia Karanzi, a representative of the Greek Union of Judicial Officials, stressed that “the bill is moving in the right direction and on a good path”.
The president of the Union of Judicial Officers of the Court of Audit, Konstantinos Efentakis, expressed full satisfaction with the provisions of the bill, noting that their demands had been fully taken into account, a view shared by the president of the Association of Employees of the Court of Audit, Marina Stavropoulou, who added that “the reform is aimed at speeding up the judicial process and the expected result will come as long as the preliminary hearing is not circumvented”.
Fotini Rozi, president of the Athens Administrative Court Judicial Officers Association, focused on the issue of understaffing in the courts, noting that while the number of European Commission adviser posts has been increasing, the number of judicial officers has not.
Finally, the Secretary General of the Panhellenic Union of Secretaries of Administrative Courts stressed the need for immediate intervention to fill vacant organizational positions in the courts, otherwise, as he estimated, this would lead to the hindrance of the achievement of the Bill’s objectives of a faster administration of justice.
RES/EMP
[ad_2]
Source link
