[ad_1]
Kathmandu, June 4. Prime Minister Pushpa Kamal Dahal Prachanda said that the public expressions of the ruling leaders will not affect the balance of power. Prime Minister Prachanda, who arrived in Chitwan on Monday, believes that this equation will continue throughout his term.
Meanwhile, Prime Minister Prachanda said that CPN-UML Chairman KP Sharma Oli’s dissatisfaction with the budget was not genuine. “He just acted as if he was protesting. It’s really not funny,” Prachanda said.
The situation in which the prime minister had to publicly refute Oli’s remarks and power trip was created after June 19. Oli had convened a parliamentary party meeting and expressed dissatisfaction with the budget for the next fiscal year 2081-082 presented by the government on June 15.
At a parliamentary party meeting on June 19, Oli called on MPs to keep their views to themselves as they could not express their satisfaction with the budget. This budget could have been a very good budget if there had been consultation and discussion with various players in the government. “Without discussion, it seems to be the budget of the finance minister, or the budget of the finance minister’s party,” Oli said that day.
Since then, Oli has been complaining about the budget in every public speech. After receiving Oli’s signal, UML MPs pointed out the weaknesses of the budget. In parliamentary practice, it is natural for the ruling party to support the budget and the opposition to criticize it.
But now the chairman of the main ruling party, the United Marxist-Leninist party, has expressed his dissatisfaction with the budget. Now that Oli has expressed his dissatisfaction, it seems that Prime Minister Prachanda has to publicly disavow the power equation.
Leaders of the power partner parties also appear to agree with Prime Minister Prachanda’s conviction. UML deputy general secretary Vishnu Rimal said there will not be any difference in the power equation based on the leaders’ public comments. “There is no difference in the power equation and this equation will move forward with confidence,” he said.
the part ollie is looking for
As there are different opinions on the budget within the ruling party, there is almost a consensus among the leaders if the power equation does not change immediately. However, one leader said that the public’s dissatisfaction with the president of the main ruling party is meaningful in itself. Seeing this problem, he expressed the public’s dissatisfaction. If everything is going well, you don’t have to keep saying this. “The leader said.
According to him, Oli said he would not give up his share by expressing public dissatisfaction with the budget. In the exercise of power, Oli began to take a stand after the new equation was formed on February 21, arguing that UML should get a share according to its status.
Sources said Oli had prepared a list of some of the main tasks to be accomplished under the new equation during the division of labour between the federal and state governments. The list included the removal of heads of state from parliamentary quotas and the recall of ambassadors.
Following Oli’s wishes, Prime Minister Prachanda removed three heads of state close to the Congress party on February 28. In Madhesh, Gandaki and Sudurpasham, the chiefs of provinces close to the Congress were removed and appointed by people recommended by the UML. But Prachanda did not implement Oli’s stand on the return of ambassadors.
Prachanda’s response was that since the investment conference was being prepared, there should be no trouble in recalling the ambassador and appointing a new one. Prachanda said at the time that he was coordinating with investors through the ambassador.
But even after the 18 Baisakh investment conference, the ambassador did not decide to return home. Instead, Prachanda started talking and discussing with the Congress leaders who were obstructing the parliament. Oli did not like this.
Oli’s absence from the joint meeting of the Union Parliament held on May 1 when President Ramchandra Paudel presented the policy and program was due to his dissatisfaction with the style of Prime Minister Prachanda. On June 2, the day after the policy and program were presented, it was confirmed that Oli’s decision to take such a drastic step to oppose the Congress by convening a parliamentary party meeting would also make Prachanda uncomfortable, as President Paudel was ready to coordinate with Prime Minister Prachanda to present the policy and program.
According to sources, Oli was unhappy because PM Prachanda showed the same style when bringing the budget as well as policies and programmes. When PM Prachanda called Baluwata on June 12 to discuss the budget, Oli expressed his displeasure. What is discussed in the budget! Let us hear it in Parliament. Oli told Prachanda that policies and programmes were also heard.
But the next day, UMA vice-chairman Bishnu Prasad Paudel and deputy prime minister and physical infrastructure minister Raghubir Mahaseth tried to finalise the budget after reaching the finance ministry. The budget for the physical infrastructure and transport ministries, which was arranged overnight, is currently being heavily criticised in Parliament.
Thus, after President Oli publicly expressed his dissatisfaction with the budget, Prime Minister Prachanda decided to withdraw the ambassador on June 24. But Prachanda publicly explained that he was not happy with the decision to withdraw the ambassador.
Prachanda arrived in New Delhi to attend the swearing-in ceremony of South Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and returned home saying, “We could have stopped for two days.”
Prachanda’s decision to visit India did not go unsupported by the UML and Oli, while admitting weakness in the decision to withdraw the ambassador. UML MP Raghuji Pant raised questions about the PM’s visit to India during the June 29 parliamentary session. The verdict should be taken by the speaker. Parliament is the first venue where the PM speaks after his arrival. What did he talk to the Indian PM about? Pant’s demand was, “They should address the parliament and give details.”
While Prime Minister Prachanda was in New Delhi, President Oli made controversial remarks about the birthplace of the religious book Ramayana Bhanet Ram. On June 25, while inaugurating the 11th regional conference of UML in Chitwan, Oli reiterated his claim that Chitwan was the birthplace of Ram.
For Modi, however, Oli’s statement was very unpleasant. Moreover, in the context of the fact that Modi’s BJP did not even get a majority in the general election with Hindutva and Ayodhya as its agenda, Oli’s public statement made sense. In other words, it is easy to think that Oli’s statement made Prachanda’s visit to Delhi difficult.
It is clear from these developments that mistrust is growing between UML Chairman Oli and Prime Minister Prachanda. But going by the developments so far, the ruling leaders seem confident that the power equation will not collapse.
But UML leaders said Prime Minister Prachanda had more responsibility to create an atmosphere of trust among the ruling parties. The prime minister has the responsibility to strengthen the balance of power. “He should coordinate more with the UML and other ruling parties rather than with the Congress in running the government,” said a leader close to Oli.
[ad_2]
Source link
