[ad_1]
According to Bakhtiyor Gudratullayev, who received the status of “Bakhti Tashkensky” in Uzbekistan, and 36 defendants here we go Otabek Koldoshev, a reporter for Dario, reports on the trial for IIB is called.
On June 3, Otabek Koldoshev, a reporter for Dario, was taken to court by Aziz Abidov, the head of the press department of the Supreme Court. Report Bakhtiyor Gudratulayev, who took part in the trial, said in response to the judge’s questions that after his release from prison, representatives of state organizations contacted him and asked him to regulate the “streets” due to the increase in stabbings of young people and athletes in the country. wroteThe editors also released a video recorded during the trial as evidence of these statements.
According to the publication, on June 22, a letter of explanation was received from the journalist, who was called to the base of IIB 405, No. 3, IIO FMB, Yunusabad District. It was said that the presiding judge of the court, Talyon Obidov, had filed a complaint against him.
Senior preventive inspector Lieutenant Colonel Kairulla Dostov, who communicated with reporters, told reporters that he was considered a suspect for reporting information on the website, which was sentenced in an open court at the Yunusabad District Court building on June 3. To this end, JIB said that the president of the Shaikhontohur District Court, Talibjon Obidov, submitted an opinion. However, the report said that the journalist was summoned to the Ministry of Internal Affairs as a suspect, but did not receive a copy of the complaint.
When Otabek Koldashev was asked what crime he had committed and which case was a mistake, the inspector replied “because you filmed a video of the court session that day and posted it on social networks.” The IIB official also said that the information provided by the journalist was published in foreign mass media.
According to IIB officials, the judge issued a petition to media representatives during the June 3 session, warning them not to disclose information that would be prejudicial to the court’s investigation.
The reporter added that in fact, the court had stated that information that would harm the judicial investigation could not be disclosed. However, the judge did not specify what information that would hinder the judicial investigation would include.
In addition, the judge’s assistant brought another Uzbeknews reporter to the court to confront the judge. Judge Talibjon Obidov warned the reporter for exposing the face of the victim who testified in court and revealing his words to the public. He said that a report would be filed with law enforcement agencies. The judge’s assistant said that they wanted to take all media representatives out of the hall and check their phones. Including the Daryo reporter. The reporter asked why. After that, the judge’s assistant gave up the idea of wiretapping and asked the reporter not to report the testimony of the victim and witnesses.
They said they had no objection to the reporter’s question, “Can we provide the defendant’s statement?” Since then, Daryo has published several reports containing the defendant’s statements during this trial. The judge did not object to other materials on the website when filing a complaint with law enforcement.
“The question arises whether the disclosure of Bakhtiyor Gudratulayev’s name in the news of the website hindered the court’s investigation or hindered his speech. However, the answer is not clear, while the case related to the disclosure of Bakhtiyor Gudratulayev’s name and photo was published not only on all websites of ‘Dario’, but also in the reports of the Supreme Court and the Ministry of Internal Affairs’ information service.
According to the publication, journalists were banned from receiving video and audio information during the trial of Bakhtiyor Gudratulayev and 36 defendants on June 10. The ruling of the president of the court was also issued in this regard.
The Supreme Judicial Council Information Service reported this explainwrote that the court’s decision did not strictly prohibit journalists and bloggers from participating in the trial, allowing them to directly observe the proceedings, take necessary notes and publish information without succumbing to various predictions and assumptions. Nevertheless, after such a ban, most journalists refused to participate in the trial, especially the “Dario” journalist.
“However, the news was published on the Internet publication Daryo, the owner of which is the website itself, not the journalist. The website reported that “on June 22, the journalist was called to the Ministry of Internal Affairs and wrote a letter of explanation, but he was not introduced to the letter of complaint.”
As far as information is concerned, the Constitution of Uzbekistan and the law “On Information Guarantee and Freedom” guarantee media representatives free access to and dissemination of information.
[ad_2]
Source link
