[ad_1]
Jussi Nuorteva, a former director of the State Archives, said it was necessary to understand what Russia’s purpose was in conducting genocide trials.
Finland Former National Archives Director Says There’s No Point in Arguing About History with Russia at This Level Yossi Notva For IS. It is more important to ask what is the purpose of Russia organizing the genocide trials against Finland.
– The most worrying thing is that in Russia these (experiments) always justify certain measures taken, Nuorteva reflected.
A week ago, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Karelia began hearing a lawsuit aimed at declaring Finland guilty of war crimes and genocide in East Karelia between 1941 and 1944.
– We should not start discussing history naively. Russian history writing does not correspond to normal history writing. It is a tool of politics. Nuorteva warned that people must constantly ask what the purpose of this Karelia trial in Russia is.
Professor Sergey Vregin appeared as an expert in a case before the Supreme Court of the Republic of Karelia concerning Finnish activities in East Karelia in 1941-1944.
According to Nuretwa One of the motivations for the trial was to tell people what the state’s official explanation of the events of the ongoing war was.
– It is first of all about shaping your own people, just like before the war in Ukraine. From then on, they began to call (Ukrainians) fascists and create a Russian narrative that does not correspond to reality, Nuorteva said.
The narrative about Ukraine provided the Russian leadership with the justification to launch an aggressive war in February 2022.
It should be made completely clear in advance that the Karelian Supreme Court will declare Finland guilty after the screening process.
What happens next?
Nuortva urged the Finnish government and defense forces to accurately assess what actions Russia could take under the pretext of the verdict.
Compensation claims could be made to Finland. Nuorteva said there could be various hybrid operations in the future, and Russia could use the trial results to justify these actions to a domestic audience.
The war reparations allocated to Finland covered the occupation of East Karelia, and the Soviet Union made no new claims after the Paris Peace Treaty. The Helsinki Sanomat reported on the signing of the peace treaty on February 11, 1947.
Finland The starting point was that the events of the ongoing war had been dealt with, a peace treaty had been concluded, and Finland’s war reparations had long been paid. The reparations also included human and material losses in East Karelia.
Therefore, the expected verdict of the Karelia trial cannot be accepted.
– The court had no legal basis, no one was called to answer the charges, no criticism was made, and the material was not made public. It was a show trial (Josip） Stalin’s Style, Nuorteva said.
Russian researchers According to Nuortva, they could use all the historical documents collected in Finland, but in the case of one fact, they did not want to do so. The same was true of the Karelian Trial, where one of the central figures was a professor at the Petroskoye State University. Sergey Vrekin.
– Nurtva said that as the first Russian expert in the trial, Professor Sergei Verikin had free access to all Finnish materials, but he did not use them and did not care about what had been done in Finnish historical research for decades.
For example, the figures given by Verigin at the trial of more than 8,000 civilians who died in the camps in East Karelia differ significantly from those in the State Archives. According to the information collected by the Finns, about 4,300 civilians died in the camps. However, according to Nuorteva, it is not possible to know from which sources Verigin obtained his information.
[ad_2]
Source link
