Broadcast United

Zebogar: Toxic atmosphere among permanent members makes it impossible for the Supreme Council to make decisions

Broadcast United News Desk
Zebogar: Toxic atmosphere among permanent members makes it impossible for the Supreme Council to make decisions

[ad_1]


Samuel Zbogar joins Echo via video link. Photo: Screen capture
Samuel Zbogar joins Echo via video link. Photo: Screen capture

On September 1, Slovenia will officially assume the rotating presidency of the UN Security Council. Currently, three of the world’s most pressing conflicts, Ukraine, Gaza and Sudan, are at the forefront of the debate. On September 25, the Supreme Council will begin a debate on “Leading for Peace”, which will be chaired by the Prime Minister of Slovenia. Robert Dove.

With Slovenia’s Ambassador to the Security Council Samuel Zbogar The host, in his capacity as a non-permanent member of the Supreme Council, spoke about Slovenia’s plans for the presidency and his eight-month experience in Slovenia. Roswitha Pesek.


What kind of opportunity is it actually to preside over the Security Council for a month? What goals will you pursue? In what areas will Slovenia strive to leave its mark?
Presiding over the Security Council is undoubtedly a major opportunity for any country, and it is even greater in September. During our presidency, we want to focus mainly on two major crises – Gaza and Ukraine. Regarding Gaza, we want to direct our three debates on the Middle East to thinking about the future, thinking about how to help manage Gaza after a ceasefire, how to restore Gaza, how to lead to a two-state solution. We just want to keep the Ukraine issue high on the agenda, thereby continuing to put pressure on the Russian Federation and waiting for the moment when the two countries are ready to sit down at the peace table. However, our main expectation is that the breakthrough, the breakthrough, the turning point on Gaza will happen in September. Will there be a truce? If a ceasefire cannot be achieved, the Council will consider new measures at this time. These are our main goals for September.


Samuel Zbogar is Slovenia's Ambassador to the United Nations Security Council. Photo: Permanent Representative of the Republic of Slovenia to the United Nations
Samuel Zbogar is Slovenia’s Ambassador to the United Nations Security Council. Photo: Permanent Representative of the Republic of Slovenia to the United Nations

Slovenia has been a non-permanent member of the Security Council for eight months. What kind of Security Council have you actually encountered, how effective is it? Because if you look at the conflicts, not just the two you mentioned, we have a terrible big problem for women in Afghanistan, now it’s been three years since the Western powers left, we have a famine in Sudan, and it looks like many conflicts like this one, which haven’t happened for a long time. So how effective is the Security Council?
It is true that there have never been so many conflicts and the effectiveness of the Security Council has been very limited, and this is due to the disunity among the permanent members, which has been further exacerbated by the Russian attack on Ukraine. This toxic atmosphere among them has been transmitted to the Security Council, making decision-making impossible. The Security Council is most effective when it is united. If all 15 countries vote in favor, resolutions are more likely to be implemented. Now we have fewer and fewer seats on the Security Council. You mentioned three conflicts, but there are many others, and I think the Security Council has played a constructive role in them, and I hope that in the future summit and the discussion led by the Prime Minister, we will discuss exactly this, about self-reflection in the Security Council, about how to change the way we operate so that we can be more effective.

Slovenia has been a non-permanent member of the Security Council for eight months. What are the findings, what are the insights, and what changes do the Security Council need to make in order to gain influence as a guardian of world peace?
The first is that whenever a crisis occurs, whenever world peace is threatened, the eyes of the world public remain on the Security Council. The Security Council, according to its founding charter, is the body responsible for peace and security, but it has not been very successful in this regard recently, and eight months later we have learned that the disunity of the Council makes it difficult to operate and resolve conflicts. I think this is our main learning. This has expanded the space for non-permanent members, and this year we have non-permanent members, even in terms of composition, whose initiatives and appeals have been more successful. But of course, for the Council to be truly effective, all 15 members must be united.

Slovenia takes over Security Council presidency on Sunday



[ad_2]

Source link

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *