[ad_1]
However, US prosecutors did not include the Baghdad video in their indictment against Assange. protector reported in 2020. In 2019, Assange was indicted for violating the Espionage Act for publishing military documents and diplomatic cables about the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq nearly six months after the Baghdad video was released.
Assange on the tarmac in Canberra.Credit: James Brickwood
U.S. prosecutors accused him of trying to hack into classified systems along with Chelsea Manning, a former Army BroadCast Unitedligence analyst who was court-martialed for violating the Espionage Act and served seven years of a 35-year sentence until Obama commuted her sentence in 2017.
When the video was first released in 2010, the Pentagon had already identified WikiLeaks as a threat to national security in a classified report, also released in 2010 by the whistleblower website. Causing further embarrassment.
WikiLeaks entered the international stage, shocking the international community and the press. The New Yorker In 2010, someone asked, “What does Julian Assange want?” WikiLeaks reportedly received more than $200,000 in donations after publishing the Baghdad video The New YorkerTwo days later, Assange tweeted: “New funding model for journalism: try changing it.”
Others were also critical of Assange. Lisa Lynch, an assistant professor of journalism at Concordia University in Montreal who has written academic papers on WikiLeaks, described the publication’s reporting at the time as “a bold attempt to intervene in the conversation.” New York Times report.
Stella Assange welcomes her husband.Credit: Alex Ellinghausen
The U.S. government has declared WikiLeaks a criminal organization for leaking classified documents, sparking concerns in the media industry about access to information from government officials.
Reuters has seen video of Amin’s attack Before WikiLeaks published it, the news organization couldn’t get it through a Freedom of Information request because the Pentagon blocked it.
At the time, WikiLeaks said it had “obtained the video and supporting documentation from multiple military whistleblowers” and had confirmed its authenticity in conversations with “eyewitnesses and journalists directly involved in the incident.”
WikiLeaks said the specific purpose of releasing the video was that “some of those killed were journalists who were simply doing their job: risking their lives to cover the war.” postal report.
loading
The existence of the video and the death of at least 11 people Although several others had been reported before WikiLeaks, Collateral Damage still attracted international attention, in part because the soldiers’ banter went far beyond the boundaries of civilian discourse. The New Yorker.
As the lead helicopter opened fire, one pilot yelled, “Ha ha ha. I hit them.” Another pilot responded a little later, “Oh yeah, look at those dead bastards.”
After the dust settled and the helicopter hovered in the air, a survivor, believed to be Reuters driver Saeed Chmagh, 40, appeared in the video. He appeared injured and unarmed.
One crew member can be heard saying, “All you have to do is get your weapon,” hoping the man will reach for his gun, which would give him a reason to shoot again.
loading
The video then shows a truck approaching. Two unarmed men got out of the car and began carrying the injured to the car. The helicopter requested an exchange of fire, and after receiving permission, it opened fire again, killing the injured man. Those who tried to help him injured two children in the van.
Ten minutes after the second round of shooting began, children were found injured. The crew blamed the Iraqis, according to The New York Times. guardianOne of them said, “Well, it’s their fault for bringing their children into the fight.” The other said, “That’s right.”
Washington post
[ad_2]
Source link
