Broadcast United

U.S. judge rules Google’s search engine violates antitrust laws

Broadcast United News Desk
U.S. judge rules Google’s search engine violates antitrust laws

[ad_1]

Technology company Google suffered a setback in a U.S. court on Monday when a federal judge ruled that the company had violated antitrust laws in the online search engine market, the first major trial of its kind against the internet giant. “Google is a monopoly and has acted in an effort to maintain its monopoly,” Judge Amit P. Mehta ruled. The tech company violated Section 2 of the Sherman Act By maintaining monopolies in search services and general advertising. The law makes it illegal to monopolize, conspire to monopolize, or attempt to monopolize the market for a product or service.

The law makes it illegal to monopolize, conspire to monopolize, or attempt to monopolize the market for a product or service. The U.S. Department of Justice, which is suing Google, argued in its lawsuit that the tech company Leverage its dominant position in the market Search engines create barriers for other companies and create a vicious cycle that works in their favor. Google defends itself by saying that alternative search engines are just a few clicks away.

According to some sources consulted by the US economic media, in this 2023 trial, the technology company announced that it would pay $26.3 billion in 2021 to become the main default search engine on electronic devices, and the money mainly went to Apple.

The company has spent tens of billions of dollars on exclusive contracts to ensure its dominance as the default search provider on smartphones and web browsers around the world.

The judge further stated in his ruling that Google’s “anti-competitive behavior” “must stop.” Specifically, the judge concluded that Google’s exclusive agreements with Apple and other major companies in the mobile ecosystem are anti-competitive. In addition, he pointed out that the company also charges high prices for search ads, which reflects its monopoly power in the search field.

While the court did not find that Google had a monopoly in search advertising, the broader outlines of the argument represented the first major decision in a wave of government-led competition lawsuits against big tech companies, including Target, Amazon or Apple face similar demands.

It is not yet known what sanctions Google will face after the judge makes its ruling.



[ad_2]

Source link

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *