
[ad_1]

In the memorable sketch from “Room Five,” Karen More plays a young actress on a children’s channel who hosts the show with her Hebrew language and expression teacher. A sixth-grade girl says on the air that her class has received an assignment: to write an essay titled “Rabin’s assassination — the pros and cons.” The teacher, played by Menashe Noy, asks her if it’s hard to find arguments in favor of the murder, to which the girl replies, “No, I don’t know who Rabin was.” The skit, which originally aired about a year after the murder, was far ahead of its time. Today, anyway, with reality beyond all imagination, such satire seems unnecessary — and Israel’s largest and most influential media tool Discussing “Rape – For and Against” on his morning showAfter all, who was Rabin, on the other hand?
Yehuda Schlesinger, a political reporter for Israel Today and a casual panelist on several channels, shared with the audience of Keshet 12’s morning show yesterday that he is in favor of a “normative policy of state abuse of detainees”. He even justified his extreme views with a legal argument familiar to every kindergartener in kindergarten: “They deserved it” and reiterated his statement that the only problem with the alleged kidnapping of detainees in the Yemeni camps is that “it is not done in an institutionalized way”.
First, let me point out that Yehuda Schlesinger is correct in this line of thinking. In a democracy, people are allowed to think extreme ideas, just as people are allowed to wear nothing but orange. You don’t have to agree with Schlesinger’s fashion choices, and you certainly don’t have to agree with his opinions, but we all have biases, and if Schlesinger’s bias is wearing orange and fantasizing about security detainees with penetrating injuries to their colons — enjoy it. To put it in his picturesque language — Schlesinger’s fantasies make me very interested in butts.
These views should never be broadcast on Israel’s most important television channel, as if calling for institutionalized rape is a legitimate view. Instead of interrupting Schlesinger’s remarks calling for the state to encourage soldiers to commit war crimes, host Niv Raskin decided to have a discussion for and against sexual torture. Schlesinger’s remarks were disgusting, and he himself later chose to apologize for them on Twitter, but his words were not the worst of the broadcaster’s remarks. The most terrible were four seemingly innocent words Raskin said: “Okay, the point is clear, Josh.”
[ad_2]
Source link