[ad_1]
Dr. Wasfi Baruti
Sejfulla Malëshova/Lame Kodra, war and party authority, appreciated by people like Nako S., Mehmet Sh., Gogo N. During the war, Secretary of the Anti-Fascist Committee of National Liberation, member of the Political Bureau, Minister of Information, Propaganda and Culture, member of the General Staff, deputy to the People’s Assembly, Chairman of the Union of Writers (its founder), Secretary of the National Liberation Front that emerged after the Perme Congress; member of the Presidium of the People’s Assembly, author of journalism and poetry.
The suffering that Malëshova went through, the obviously false accusations, the sentence to exile, the toil in Fir’s warehouse, the humiliation of being a dealer in animal carcasses, was unbearable, and if the assessor would have accepted it, he would not have been subjected to any of these horrors. Enver asked for an engagement with Enver’s sister Sano. Malëshova’s answer was: “Never, never”!
Despite the fact that the dictator Enver H. at a Politburo meeting on February 26, 1973, when discussing the history of the national liberation war, made it possible to think of the dictator without mentioning Malëshova, and not in all real assessment: “… Thank you Sejfulla Malëshova, who did not make any contribution during the war, neither in the army nor in the party, he was only the Minister of Education, it can only be said that he was appointed Minister of Education. “(A) Shameless scum!
In the first post-war years, Maleshova was sent to the Communist artillery: enemies, traitors to the party, internal and external hostile activities, reaction in agriculture, industry, culture. The Fifth Plenum of the Kazakh Republic (February 21, 1946) expelled Maleshova from the Politburo of the Kazakh Republic. There are also two pages of source arguments on “hostile” activities, in which sentences are cut from journalistic works and Maleshova’s books, in which no signs of anti-party or enemy are seen.
The dictator accused from the air: “Sejfulla Malëshova distorted the party line, deviated from it. /…/ S. Malëshova not only never had anything to do with the war (!!), but in the tasks assigned to him he was openly against the party. /…/ Sejfulla Malëshova’s views are foreign to our party, they deviate from the party line, weaken the class struggle, become a substitute for reaction. /…/ His views are anti-Marxist, hostile. …” In the following archival page of the conviction of Sejfulla Malëshova with false arguments, there is no doubt that Malëshova’s “hostile” views were clearly correct according to the requirements of the war and post-war period, but the dictator misinterpreted them: “He (Maleshova) supported a very broad front, in which the enemies of the people could easily disguise themselves and carry out their activities. / …/ He supported a soft policy against the enemies. /…/ Maleshova defended the views of the reactionary Catholic clergy who sweetened politics (following the defense of Maleshova from the pen of the dictator. /…/ He was a defender of the view that some “reactionary” intellectuals should be placed in /…/ so that the private sector was broadly free. /…/ Supposedly to protect progressive intellectuals, it encouraged and promoted reactionary intellectuals. /…/(2)
Sentenced to exile, hard labor and, most seriously, incitement to popular contempt, Maleshova took her own life amid physical torture and political humiliation on trumped-up charges. The hostility of the dictator reflected the criticism of Maleshova in the main report of the Second Plenum of the KQ, “The Political Situation”, and therefore remains unknown and has been stripped of the censorship of the archives, but the main points still exist in the criticism of the war, the party, the leadership, her and Enver H.
Extract from the critical discussion at the Second Plenum of the Berat Central Committee in November 1944
“Leaders and presidents of political parties or movements are not created by decree. The war brings them out, they must have come out, they appear in the war and then popularize other comrades. You have to understand and choose the right moment.
Let’s take the example of Enver, the “chairman” of the party. In our party, there should not be a leader who is not on the same page as the party. Without a proper party, there can be no proper president. It is not enough to be the political secretary of a party (Enver H.), one must also be the chairman.
/…/ The President should have shown the party the right path without going out, instead of going out and walking in the Enveri brigade, as Tuku said. /…/ Therefore, the policies of the President and the leaders are not well formulated, not well resolved, not well implemented. Nako said that Liri G. made an initiative (proposal) for Enver (to become a party unit), and this work took a mediocre and headless form. The feature was that my friend Baca (citaku) suggested that I write slogans for Enver that he is a genius! In this way, we become ridiculous and we discredit Enver himself. ” (3)
The dictator quoted Maleshova’s published works and press reports out of context and made unfounded accusations. At the Second Plenum, Maleshova criticized the distorted understanding of the front, hoping that it was too broad, and even received the support of Enver, but at the Fifth Plenum (1947) she changed her view and accused Maleshova of “supporting a very broad front”, while at the Second Plenum Enver criticized himself that “we do not have the idea of a broad front”, Enver against Enver! Maleshova distorted the arguments about the Catholic clergy in the North and their retreat to the front and claimed that “no Catholic loves Enver”. (4) The dictator was against Segifula M.
In retaliation for the hostility towards Maleshova, the dictator also had reason to tighten his character. Maleshova, a prominent intellectual, educated politician, cultured, sympathetic and respected in the party and in public opinion, a famous poet, sympathized by Tirana diplomats. This was in stark contrast to Enver, as described by Nako S.: “… Enver was always first in everything, kicked everyone. He would consider everyone else small. There was no leadership temperament. …” (5) Enveri, who had only a high school diploma and nothing else, had a huge cultural and party difference between him and Maleshova: a cabinet minister in the Noli government, a graduate of the philosophy department of Moscow Lomonosov University, a professor of philosophy at Lomonosov University for two years, a member of the Communist International and its envoy to the Albanian war.
Political humor!
The dictator leveled serious political-ideological charges against Malëshova – enemy of the people, traitor to the party, deviator, softener of the class war, etc. Surprisingly, for this view, these charges were hidden, cancelled and transformed into charges of incompetence: “Sejfulla Malëshova showed incompetence and gross dereliction of duty”. Political humor!
Humor, why? Condemning Maleshova as an enemy, a traitor to the motherland and the party, a person who deviated from the party’s Marxist path, “arguing” that internal and external reactionaries would use it to attack the party, the dictator ordered the bureaucracy and members of the plenum to the statement of the Fifth Plenum: “… Every reactionary slogan should be countered with the official position: ‘Segifula Maleshova is dismissed from her ministerial post because she has shown great incompetence and dereliction of duty, she does not work, does nothing. If she does not fulfill her duties in our country, she will be dismissed from her post and placed where she deserves. “(6) As shown in the fax below.
What is real? Sejfulla Malëshova has many friends around her, enjoys respect and honor, so it is expected that there will be people who openly or silently oppose his sentence, opinions are opposed. Enver puts on or takes off a mask in defense.
MALĕSHOVA, the bridegroom of the Hoxha family…
Enver felt himself in the shadow of Maleshova, but he thought about it and decided to narrow it down and put aside the contrast with her for the sake of his sister Sano, an experienced bachelor, also experienced bachelor S. Maleshova, and decided to narrow it down and put aside the contrast with her, for the sake of his sister Sano, an experienced bachelor, also experienced bachelor S. Maleshova, and decided to narrow it down and put aside the contrast with her, for the sake of his sister Sano, an experienced bachelor, also experienced bachelor S. Maleshova, and decided to narrow it down and put aside the contrast with her, for the sake of his sister Sano, an experienced bachelor, for the sake of his sister S. Maleshova …
Pandi Kristo, an office worker and a close friend of Enver, said that the entrances to the residences were door-to-door: “The doors of our house were open to our family. /…/ Professor Sejfulla Malëshova was one of our and even Enver’s regular guests, he was welcomed by us and was very charming. This fact also attracted the attention of Nexhmije Hoxha, so one day she told me without hesitation: Listen, friend Pandi, Sejfullaj is single, and we (and Enver) think it would be nice to marry him to Enver’s sister Sano. What do you think? Can you tell Sejfulla about this? Of course, the sky fell, and I was surprised at Nexhmije’s courage. /…/ Sejfullaj told me that Enver’s sister often put a red rose in his jacket pocket. “The desert is thinking of stretching its claws out to me, an experienced bachelor”, Sejfullaj I did what I did and conveyed her request to Sejfulla: “Old fox”, he said, adding: “Listen Pandi, I have no money left for Enver to give alms, I never did anything to him”. (7)
Primary Sources
1. AQS. Report of the Institute of Marxism-Leninism, February 26, 1973.
2. The Fifth Plenary Session of the Republic of Kazakhstan, February 21, 1946.
3. United States, Fund 14, File 2, 1944.
4. February 21, 1946, the Fifth Plenary Session of the Republic of Kazakhstan
5. Vladimir Dedil. Yugoslav-Albanian relations. 1949.
The Letters of Naco Spirou: A Short Biography of Enver Hoxha.
6. The Fifth Plenary Session of the Republic of Kazakhstan, February 21, 1946.
7. Pandi Kristo, interview by Gjergj Titani. Panorama
2023: May 22
Communiqué Panorama
[ad_2]
Source link
