[ad_1]
There are two points on the agenda for the Grand Council meeting on Friday, August 30. Following a proposal from the President’s Office, Parliament is asked to consider the possibility of reversing the order of the paragraphs. The RF objects.
We start with this Paragraph 1 is devoted to communications, including responses to questions and queries. Space was provided for debate on two highly topical issues, drought/water supply and plummeting birth rates, among other topics.
Matteo Casali (RF) gave an in-depth analysis of the creation of the “artificial reservoir on the San Marino River in the Gorgascula area”, conveying “the state of the art in technical research”. He recalled that “the annual water requirement is 3.6 million cubic litres, with supply largely dependent on foreign countries”. On the issue of demographic decline, Antonella Muraroni (RF) presented an agenda in which “the Grand General Council commits to appointing a Special Commission on Demographic Trends to study in depth the causes of the current fertility trends by carrying out structured investigations, in order to be able to propose all appropriate solutions, including structural ones”.
Dalibor Riccardi (Libira) recalled that “among the priorities of the majority, there is certainly a case for interventions in support of families”. We need “reasoning not only based on welfare, but also on ensuring that we can have a high quality of life and that everyone has the opportunity to live with dignity”.
Giovanni Zonzini (Rete) intervened: “Our proposal is a state-controlled company that could raise funds through a capital increase to invest in the energy and water sectors.” On the topic of falling birth rates: “A smart country cannot just throw money at this trend, but should adopt a rational and wise immigration policy to keep the workforce dynamic and active.”
The agenda for non-performing loan management is published via the Internet.
Carlotta Andreuccioli (D-ML) focused on the failure to participate in the Paralympic Games. “There have been countless times in this context that San Marino has not sent athletes. I read many articles on social media and I do not want to get into the accusatory abuse. But it is absurd not to be represented in these cases and not to value those who deserve it.”
Comma 1 was suspended at 11 a.m. to resolve Article 2 provides for the appointment of two alternate members of the Board of Directors to ensure the constitutionality of the rulesThe nominees were Stefano Manacoda and Antonio Maruccia. There was unanimous recognition of the “value and professionalism of the two personalities” in the vote. However, the opposition raised some criticisms on the “methodological” issue and another issue: the possible academic and professional relationship between “members of the Commission of Guarantees and judges of the Court”.
Matteo Rossi (PSD) said that “the person identified for this position is someone who clearly reflects the principles set out in San Marino legislation: a clear reputation and skills. The Consortium tried to identify a person who embodies these characteristics in professional and academic life.” He added that Dr Antonio Maruscia “will definitely bring added value.”
“The names proposed are impeccable” said Nicola Renzi (Rf). However, “we would prefer to have both appointments at the opening of the legislature rather than having to discuss with the majority to reach an appointment according to the criteria we wish to set for ourselves”.
Two considerations for Secretary of State Andrea Bellucci. The first is about the composition of the Academy. “I want it to be clearly expressed. People from freelancers, university professors, etc. Because the skills required are complex.” Therefore, he stressed that “all six members have equal dignity” and do not distinguish between members and alternates.
Massimo Andrea Ugolini (PDCS) believes that “the courses that attracted the attention of the CGG were of the highest level”. “When you go to look for high-level courses, it is normal to have some knowledge, but this does not mean that there is any idea”, he later recalled in response to Renzi.
“It is very important to put these nominations to a vote. Secretary of State Stefano Canti said that this is not only an important step, but also undoubtedly necessary. I would like to point out that it is with these two appointments that the integrity of the Academy is restored.”
Carlotta Andruccioli (D-ML) made a series of observations: “There is something to be said about the approach. They are all majority appointments. They were brought to a meeting but would not reveal other names. It is said that there are connections with authoritative members of the court.”
“After receiving the names from the majority, a simple web search revealed that one of the two names proposed had academic and institutional ties to the President of the Court – Sarah Conti (RF) observed. There is nothing to complain about the name itself, but the proximity seemed inappropriate to us.”
Here is the response from Luca Boschi (Libera): “It seems paradoxical that every time a name is raised, very superficial Google searches begin in search of connections. I speak not only for this situation, but it has also happened in the past. The connection is inevitable. We are talking about personalities of a certain importance, who worked and created something.” Hence the invitation “not to be overcome by psychosis, either on one side or the other”.
“I think that we must also address any incompatibilities with the Supervisory Board, given the general desire to implement institutional reforms”, said Emanuele Santi (Rete).
Aska News
[ad_2]
Source link
