[ad_1]
Over the years, Express A fundamental question is raised that has not been answered: If there is no democracy within the political parties, how can they convince us that they will deepen democracy at the national level? Step by step, step by step, step by step, Everyone else just has to behave!
The military sentence of former French Industry Minister Jean-Pierre Chevènement remains a textbook case: “The minister should either shut up or resign.” In Mauritius, Paul Bérenger, who in the distant past was a member of the Council of Ministers, paid the price for his disagreements with the Prime Minister, sometimes with the SAJ (1983, 1993) and sometimes with Ramgoolam (1997), having himself expelled or closed doors because of differences of opinion.
The “open the door if you don’t agree” approach remains the hallmark of almost all political parties in Mauritius. If Bélanger had to go on the offensive against the SAJ or Ramgoolam, he would also purge the MMM of several strong men who tried to confront him. Hervé Masson, Kader Bhayat, Jack Bizlall, Ram Seegobin, Jean Claude de l’Estrac, Amedée Darga, Ivan Collendavelloo, Alan Ganoo or Steven Obeegadoo are just a few names on a long list of radicals who had to give in. Maximo Leader, Who cannot accept contradictory thinking.
Within the MSM, we remember that SAJ also ousted Lutchmeenaraidoo (long before their reunion in 2014), Ramjuttun, Dulloo (who was, nonetheless, Pravind’s designated successor when he was not yet in trouble) and his brother Ashock to establish his authority and that of his family, which today is almost the sole shareholder of Sun Trust.
***
In light of what has happened in Bangladesh, it is necessary to ask: have our politicians become slaves to their parties and therefore to their dynasties? Is this the only way to succeed in politics and enter parliament? By declaring one’s ethnicity, while ignoring Mauritianism, to which one is politically committed? Once in parliament, are we obliged to greet, greet, greet again to the party leader if we want to keep our Mercedes or our status as “yes men” around the party leader? Who is stifling critical thinking and contradictory debate?
Political parties are the link between the people and the government. At home, we must know how to negotiate on the side of Ramgoolam and then on the side of Jagannath, knowing that there is no ideology in politics anymore.
The opposition, deprived of the “good stuff” of power, must propose alternative solutions to the policies of the majority (pension hikes, 14th month, etc.) and perform what some call “functions” (according to the famous expression of Georges Lavau, referring to the “tribune of the plebs” of ancient Rome), reflecting the dissatisfaction of some popular voters. To be effective, we cannot be hot and cold like some unionists. Otherwise, this will lead to a certain disillusionment of citizens with the political parties, who no longer consider them to be their best representatives and mediators. “They are all like this/Once in opposition, once in government/They try to have the bananas from both ends,” It is a criticism we level at politicians and political parties, and it is usually justified.
Today, it is time to start some kind of professionalization or moralization of political life to put an end to the feeling of monopoly that exacerbates the crisis of legitimacy of representative democracy and fosters a sense of political alienation. This explains the growing separation between elected officials and the people and leads to an undecided rate of around 50%.
Meritocracy must enter political office. and Maximo Leader What we have seen is that political parties, like factions, separate citizens from political power through their outright monopoly on democratic representation.
Since our political system is based on political parties vying for power, they should allow the public to express different expectations of their government, but in reality, they are “war machines” whose main goal is to allow a certain group to seize power. As the almost indispensable middlemen between citizen voters and their democratic institutions, political parties are therefore responsible for hijacking our democracy…
[ad_2]
Source link
