[ad_1]
Surprisingly, Repubblica Futura was able to overturn the dismissal decision in the AASS-Public Netco-ZTE case, claiming that the project was good and that RETE had unnecessarily clogged the court, essentially out of revenge and political calculations. Examining the reasons why the court ordered the filing of the documents, a very different picture emerges.
For example, the fact is The Principality of Andorra provided only some of the bank documents of AASS consultant Jaume Salvat Font, and therefore could not exclude or confirm his improper knowledge of usefulness.
Translation: Didn’t receive bank statement, The court was unsure whether Salvat Font had obtained an unfair profit or undue advantage for himself or others. Therefore, there is a lack of evidence to prove that it constitutes a serious fraud. But what if the cards were fully made?
Another ambiguity appeared in ZTE’s current accounts, where the amounts received from Public Netco were mixed up with those already in existence. This confusion of data led to another criminal act being investigated, namely, disloyal management, offside, which was eventually discovered. Insufficient investigation elements.
The court’s investigation concluded that while citizens and businesses are required to adhere to strict deadlines and procedures, when it comes to party nominations, we enter the realm of “anything goes”. Then it happens that compensation is awarded The administrators called to negotiate a million-dollar contract (someone who makes deals on behalf of the state but does not assume any responsibility). As it happens, a lawyer called at two different times to play the roles of the controlled and the controller, voting in her name to support the millionaire’s spending promises and then, after a change of clothes, voting to legalize those promises as well.
It so happened that Andorracanide lied to the Financial Commission and signed a contract with the San Marino subject that was not adequately secured, was not registered and had no preliminary project.
Of course, the document states that no criminal record was found in such conduct – these are the words of the court – The lawyers could have better abstained, the state could have better conducted a public tender, and the behavior of the members of the board of directors of Salvat Font and Public Netco was affected by “reprehensible imprudence.” Finally, the evaluation of the merits: the defects found are reprehensible and show that they acted in a manner inconsistent with the principles of sound and prudent management of the assets under management.
RF colleagues, where is the inconsistency in RETE’s actions? For those of us who have struggled with the opacity of certain practices, the court’s reasoning is a medal.
Do the principles of the code of conduct also apply to Secretaries of State and MPs? Therefore, if there are elements, signs or reasonable suspicion of illegal activity, there is a duty to report. andThese factors do exist, but all parties, including the Russian Federation, generally tend to turn a blind eye to them.
If anything, they will be the ones who have to explain With what moral and political codes, with what national consciousness, did they entrust this sensitive issue to people who violate the principles that apply to all entrepreneurs, administrators, and public and private employees.
Do we want to look at the Titori case as well? RF dismisses the story by downplaying it: “Confuorti & Co. is a mainstream story used to sell itself to voters,” as if fighting back against wrongdoing is a populist habit that senior politicians should gracefully slide away from. We are not talking about reprehensible behavior here, but actual condemnation.
So far we have: A judge (a judge) sentenced to four years in prison at first instance for attempted extortion and abuse of power; investigated for suspected crimes along with other protagonists in the securities case.
Former Secretary of State Sely (Secretary of State) was sentenced at first instance for attempted extortion, and the former manager of Banca Cis was sentenced to 5 years and 10 months in prison on appeal.
RF friends, could this be a witch hunt over electoral calculations? Please let us try to keep this serious.
net
RETE tells the story of ZTE in a 2022 video, available at the link www.movimentorete.org/i-nostri-video-report/
[ad_2]
Source link
