Broadcast United

Between populism and extremism

Broadcast United News Desk
Between populism and extremism

[ad_1]

The attack could well allow Donald Trump to return to the White House. The greatest irony is that the former president who had the least respect for North American democracy and its institutions is now part of the defenders of democracy. He missed Joe Biden’s inauguration after losing his reelection in 2021, something that has not happened since the 19th century. He was associated with the shocking invasion of the Capitol, unprecedented in American history. While on duty, he was the target of two impeachment proceedings, half of the impeachment proceedings that have occurred in the country’s history.

Even so, despite thisWith this attack, Trump has turned to the side that counts as a democratic legacy to be defended. World leaders from all walks of life have taken a stand. Emmanuel Macron spoke of the tragedy of our democracies, Lula da Silva and Antonio Guterres have clearly condemned an unacceptable attack. Together with them are Ursula von der Leyen, Xi Jinping, Orbán, Meloni, Zelensky, Netanyahu, Olaf Scholz and the recently elected Keir Starmer. Don’t forget Joe Biden himself, who doesn’t care about being decent to those who are not decent to him.

But it’s not just that Trump was the victim of an attack, a glancing bullet that tangled with his ear, leaving us hanging. It’s also the energy and fearlessness of the response from presidents who didn’t flinch, who showed no sign of succumbing to death threats in the history of American democracy.

Trump clenched his fist in a display of resolve and strength. Comparisons with Biden become inevitable when he appears less and less, when he makes mistakes when he doesn’t read something we don’t know if he wrote, leading to confusion that people shout to the sky, like when he confused Putin and Zelensky’s names at a recent summit, or when he mistook his opponent Trump for Vice President Kamala Harris in an interview in which — who knows why — he decided to speak in a low voice while answering questions.

Populist Trump represents a danger, but as great as the danger is, even given the centuries of history of North American democracy, we can assume that they have been tested. The system prevailed, Trump resigned after being defeated, and if he were to run again now, he would play by the rules.

Biden also poses other dangers that should not be underestimated. It is not just his increasingly obvious weaknesses. Paradoxically, this fragile figure is today the face behind a great power on the international stage. Not Trump, but Biden, the man who served as president of the United States while two wars were painfully ongoing.

In addition to the news that more people are dying every day, there is news that this news may be very wrong. The famous medical journal The Lancet said that this genocide may cause 180,000 deaths. It is Israel, but only the United States can help. Instead, they use weapons to fuel the conflict. There is also the war in Ukraine, which is not only about the sovereignty of the people, but also about the territorial influence of NATO, which is growing in influence but intervening less and less.

Between the populists and the irrelevant, everything is terrible and getting worse, but maybe between terrible and worse, Biden means more danger to the world today. Trump’s rhetoric was mostly for domestic consumption, make America great again, with a lot of showmanship, but no real desire for war, NATO was the tenth priority or close to it.

Trump, who calls himself the greatest of the great leaders, does not mind Putin becoming one of them, nor does he mind pursuing an unstable or even risky foreign policy. Under the shadow of weakening power, the Biden administration is uncomplacently replacing and unfolding the mechanisms that are most likely to cause conflicts in the world order.

It’s time for progressive forces within the Democratic Party to find a better alternative than Biden, a face of an administration that replaces his and can once again say “no” to populism.

The author wrote according to the old spelling.



[ad_2]

Source link

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *