[ad_1]
The matches between Quito and Barcelona always contain a special rivalry and have a rich history. News reached the main port from the capital that the regions had founded the University Sports League club in 1930, initiated by students and professionals who graduated from the Central University. It is understood that since his first participation in the Pichincha Group 1 competition, he has decisively defeated his opponents and won the championship.
The capital’s leadership was aware of Barcelona’s presence in Guayaquil and the team quickly won over the vast majority of the fans. The two first met in 1931 when the Canarian team travelled to Quito to inspect the city’s football team.
There are enough absurdities; there is only one classic
The duel between the white bull and the matador in the Ecuadorian Championship originated in 1960. The match was held twice in Guayaquil. Barcelona won 4-0, Quito 0-0. That season, the yellow team won their first national star. The sporting rivalry has grown over time, but like many of the country’s problems, competition at this level is distorted by regionalism.
To understand the roots of regionalism, you have to read a book written in 1925 by Luis Dillon, the finance minister of the military government formed by the Julian Revolution. The work is titled Ecuador’s economic and financial crisis It sums up the confrontation between state power and that of the Bank of Guayaquil; a dispute that was fierce but with a regionalist twist. The creation of the Central Bank shifted economic and political power to Quito. This strategic realignment changed the rules of the game for political power in the country. The media in both cities polarized discussions encouraging strong regionalism. Unfortunately, sports rivalries were also affected by this social distortion.
Not only in football, but also in other sports, Guayas and Pichincha compete with each other. Football, with its inherent elements of passion and belonging, can easily fall victim to this kind of competition, which has the side effects of regionalism.The attempt to create another match – I mean the league match against Barcelona – ranked as the one of greatest national interest to replace the Canary Islands’ match against Emelec has its history.
There is a reason why this wish was not fulfilled. Over time, and taking advantage of various circumstances, Barcelona played against La Liga. Certain interested parties co-opted La Liga in an attempt to create a unique scenario: to build and consolidate it as the greatest football tournament in the country.
There is no doubt that Barcelona’s two appearances in the Copa Libertadores final in 1990 and 1998 brought great international influence to Astilero; moreover, at that time it was already the team with the most national championships and, most importantly, enjoyed unparalleled popularity. Ten years later, Quito Liga became the first Ecuadorian club to win the Copa Libertadores (2008) and finished runner-up in the Club World Cup. The Cup Winners’ Cup and the Sudamericana Cup followed, plus the Los Albos Nacional Trophy in 2010, ushering in their most important era.
Fueled by these successes, the Quito League began a campaign to expand its popularity throughout the country. Although he only partially achieved his goal, especially in the central and northern regions of Ecuador’s mountain ranges. Meanwhile, the number of followers of the shipyard idol continued to grow exponentially, spreading throughout all latitudes of Ecuador.which can be easily verified by the attendance of Barcelona fans in any stadium in the country.
In 2008, amid the lily-colored success of Barcelona in Guayaquil, the famous marketing expert, economist Eduardo Maruri was announced as president. In his vision, he prioritized the transformation of the club into a strong brand and advocated from his imagination that the matches against the Liga should be classified as “national classics”. The idea was immediately rejected by the media and fans, who believed that the only classic in Ecuador was the El Clásico in Astilero.
Marulli’s “creative” attempts were unsuccessful, and, moreover, Barcelona’s 2008 campaign was not successful. However, the proposal to invent a national classic became a breeding ground for those who were interested. Making the match between the matadors and the Azucenas the most watched and favorite match among Ecuadorian fans. That hidden desire has not disappeared.
It reappears from time to time, sponsored by a media world that has not given up on this desire. Exhibitionism usually dominates the discourse about this game, as it did this Sunday at the White House. For a long time we have lived with the story of the long unbeaten run against Barcelona in the league at the Rodrigo Paz Delgado Stadium.
Barcelona’s return to the Olympics after winning its 16th title in 2020 in the home of the league, and the fact that on Saturday, April 15, 2023, the Canaries beat the league in their own stadium – after 25 years, six months and ten days – are two facts that weaken the interest in making it a national classic. For those who wonder why the Barcelona League is not a national classic, it is important to remind them that a classic in football consists of several fundamental factors that need to be taken into account.
For example, tradition, rivalry, the identity of the fans, a sense of belonging and, of course, history. The magic of the classics was not invented overnight, nor is it sold as a forgetfulness drug in any pharmacy. In the history of world classics, none was created through marketing or as a product of research on consumer habits.
The magic of the shipyard has a logical and natural explanation. Only Barcelona vs. Emelec showed a cathartic factor, allowing fans to achieve a purification of passion in the confrontation. If you don’t understand, the classic is not the one that won the most sports championships.
FIFA itself, which recognizes the classic from every country in the world, attributes the Astilero to Ecuador. The same is true for English magazines Four, four, two, The magazine released a ranking of the world’s most important classics, with Astillero ranked 34th.
And if these reasons are not enough, there is another important factor that proves that the league and Barcelona are not national classics: as a duel with history and confrontation, it has not been universally recognized by a country. It has not received the national recognition that any classic in any country of the world has. The game between the Canary and the White Wolf should be respected and admired, a reason that should not distract from the affections of its loyal followers.
It’s time to stop wasting time encouraging competition born out of disgust They are just trying to forge a title that cannot be recognized. (profound)
[ad_2]
Source link
