We like to think we are a secular country, but our constitution needs to catch up with modern Australia

[ad_1]

Australia is one of the least religious countries in the world. In the most recent census, 10 million people say they have no religious affiliationwithin the next decade, nonbelievers may become the majority.

This is not a bad thing. Religious wars have plagued the globe for centuries, and they continue to do so today. The number of Christians has been declining steadily for decades, while the number of Muslims, Buddhists, Hindus, Sikhs, and Jews has grown to 10% of the population.

Managing religious diversity brought about by large-scale immigration once again raises a Political challenges facing the Australian government. Secular democracy requires serious and fair political leadership.

Australia is a country without an official religion, and for good reason. In the colony of New South Wales, religion reflected the principles of the Enlightenment. God was no longer seen as an unquestionable source of knowledge. By the time the constitution was drafted, religion had become a more complex political trade-off between Protestants and Catholics.

On January 1, 1901, a parade marked the birth of the new nation through the streets of Sydney, complete with floats, ceremonial arches, marching bands and hundreds of thousands of people.

But Cardinal Patrick Moran, who had recently overseen the reconstruction of St. Mary’s Cathedral (the spire took another century to be built), sat on the steps of the cathedral.

He had hoped to stand at the head of the parade and offer a prayer at the ceremony in Centennial Park. After all, he had won the votes of Irish Catholic Republicans for Federation and reached a political compromise of no official religion in Australia.

Late on New Year’s Eve he was told that the honour of praying belonged only to the head of the Anglican Church.

Although there is no official religion, this does not mean that religion is isolated from politics. The cardinal sat on the steps, angry, surrounded by a group of Catholic students.

Some saw this as a good sign that Australia would not be overly influenced by meddling priests. But Moran and his successors were sectarian warriors who fought back politically for decades, defeating two conscription referendums, building schools, shaping professions and nurturing aspirational people.

As a student at St Mary’s Cathedral College, Anthony Albanese no doubt heard stories of Catholic exclusion. The impact was real. The editor who hired me in the late 1970s was acutely aware of it. He declared that he was hiring women “because you girls are New Irish (Catholics) and you will work twice as hard for half the pay.”

The first Catholic governor-general, William Deane, was only appointed in 1996, a post that had been held by two Jews decades earlier, Isaac Isaacs, the first Australian-born governor-general, and Zelman Cowan, who cleaned up the mess left by John Kerr.

Today, the sectarian divisions that once tore apart families and political parties exist only on the margins of public life.

In this country, some people are passionate about their faith, but many do not care about it. This country needs other institutions to actively participate in its changing nature and convey the values that the church once taught. When I was a child, people said “Do not do to others what you do not want others to do to you”, and other religions expressed the same moral values in different words.

The growing tensions in Australia’s social fabric over the past year suggest that the government has failed to uphold this spirit. It has failed to recognise that religious and ethnic diversity is an asset and that constitutional reform is needed to ensure that all citizens have the same rights.

The constitution has not yet adapted to the fact that nearly half the population has dual citizenship, which would prevent them from running for parliament without active intervention. In the UK, Canada and New Zealand, dual citizenship is not a disqualification.

In 2017, 15 lawmakers were removed from office, while others were busy ensuring that dual citizenship that some people did not even know they had was revoked.

There has been Decades of warnings Section 44 of the constitution, which bars anyone “enjoying foreign rights and privileges” from holding elected office, is a stumbling block that could render parliament inoperable. But rather than passing legislation to restrict it or amending the constitution, it remains a threat.

This is one of the reasons why we need a strong, permanent Constitutional Commission – to make the Constitution truly inclusive.

We need a strong standing constitutional commission, a body that would have surely recommended that last year’s referendum include two proposals: one to give meaningful recognition to Aboriginal people, and one to ensure that all Australian citizens could run for seats in parliament, regardless of where they were born.

Together they will craft a truly inclusive constitution. Such a committee It is a sign of system failure.

Other institutions have weakened, too. The privatization of social services has left immigrants to seek community and connection in churches, mosques, and temples rather than in public organizations. Overfunding of private schools has become a way for parents to outsource their children’s moral education. This trade-off has not translated into sustained faith, with millennials and Gen Z being the least religious.

Populist media is spreading more rapidly than ever before Blamed and tortured for differences As Senator Fatima Payman discovered, unregulated social media is inherently inflammatory.

When threats loom, diversity, respect and tolerance may seem like luxuries, but they are more important than ever. Especially for Muslims, who make up nearly 4% of Australia’s population, and Jews, who make up less than 1%.

Labor officials, furious at Senator Payman’s decision to follow his conscience and party policy and vote to recognise Palestine, have been murmuring about testing whether Senator Payman’s Afghan citizenship has really been revoked.

They would do well to remember that in 1950, two years after Australian citizenship became a reality, a Section 44 proceeding was brought to disqualify a “Roman Catholic” MP. The argument was that his first allegiance was to the Vatican. The Supreme Court disagreed, but mixing politics and religion rarely ends well.