[ad_1]
We are always changing. We adopt a replacement policy because we always think this person or that person should be “replaced” or “sent home” and “find a younger replacement.”
We are always quick to discard older people, reasoning that they have been there too long and need to be laid off, but in doing so we often forget the knowledge base, experience, know-how and skills these people have.
I also remember watching certain movies, especially about karate, where whenever a person wanted to be better than someone else, or become invincible, they would always seek help from a master or expert in a particular skill.
So, instead of discarding or laying off people, why not use these people in a mentor capacity, allowing them to guide and enrich their successors over time so that both parties gain relevance and importance?
While I have no problem with the substitution factor, I have issues with the substitution method, the substitution reason, and how the values and talents of the experts are not valued.
Both the old and the new or hopeful can adapt, certainly with a reduction in the old’s workload or pay, but this continued involvement and engagement will keep both parties satisfied and when the final transition is complete, there will be less hostility.
Too many of our best-trained professionals are fired and ignored because the hours are too long. We need to understand that nothing hurts self-esteem more than feeling unwelcome.
I get sad when the so called “new guy” doesn’t have the right attitude, enthusiasm or passion of the former. In most cases you may pay less but the quality and standards may go down.
Take the media, for example. The best is yesterday, the standards to be upheld seem to have disappeared, and the standards and quality of the “now” are questioned.
We need to adopt the idea of seamless transition, ensuring that respect for the old masters and experts is not forgotten and that love should flow from one person to the other rather than continuing in a cruel situation.
Change is inevitable and new options should be sought, but the qualities of great men and scholars must not be discarded as they are now. Sometimes we change based on what we hear, believe or are influenced by, but sometimes we make decisions that end up compromising standards, which is common in some of the political decisions we make.
When it comes to change, everyone tries their best, but change is not always for the better, nor is it always the wiser approach, as the output of new things may not always meet current needs.
Young people will eventually take power, but past standards must not be ignored or regarded as irrelevant, as coordination and compromise must also be taken into account.
Why? Because too many people are killed before they die, and because we want to maintain the meaning of existence until we die.
[ad_2]
Source link
