[ad_1]
Younis Said
The recent international summit on peace in Ukraine, held in Switzerland in the absence of Russia and other international actors, ended with a call to “engage all parties to the conflict” in order to achieve peace, raising many questions about the feasibility of the summit and the possibility of achieving peace in the absence of one of the main parties to the conflict.
In principle, the entire international community is eager for peace in Ukraine, but the question is the way to achieve this peace, because it would make no sense to invite about a hundred countries and international institutions to this summit without inviting Russia, whose party is mainly focused on the Ukrainian crisis, and whose absence prevented the participation of major international countries such as China, as well as some of Russia’s lower-level allies such as Brazil, South Africa and India.
On the other hand, the holding of this summit immediately after the G7 summit, in which, in addition to Western military support, 50 billion dollars were allocated to support Ukraine, as well as NATO’s preparations for a possible confrontation with Russia, raise questions about the seriousness of the search for peace in Ukraine. Peace and preparations for war cannot coexist, and the seriousness of the search for peace requires objectivity and taking into account the interests of all parties, which was not mentioned in the final statement issued at the summit, which put forward proposals aimed at mobilizing all parties. The largest number of countries support the end of the Ukrainian war based on a victory of one side at the expense of the other. This idea assumes the holding of another summit with the participation of Russia to stop the war, exchange prisoners and other issues, including how to ensure global food supplies through the Black Sea and the Sea of Azov, all of which are based on Zelensky’s plan for the withdrawal of Russian troops from all Ukrainian lands, including the re-control of the Russian-controlled Zaporizhia nuclear power plant in the south of the country, and demand respect for the independence and sovereignty of the country under international law.
But no one talked about Russia’s vital interests or the search for a new European security formula based on fairness that takes into account the interests of all parties, either at the Swiss summit or at the G7 summit that preceded it. This special context may prompt Russia to propose a more stringent initiative without Ukraine joining NATO, based on the recognition of new facts and realities on the ground.
In this sense, both sides may have a desire to end the war through negotiations, but the path to peace begins with concessions from both sides, neither ready to continue the war nor to achieve peace through Kiev’s support for the Western world. It is impossible to impose a solution on a great power like Russia, which is capable of confronting the Western alliance, even if it would bring the world to the brink of the abyss.
[ad_2]
Source link
