[ad_1]
Poklonskaya talks about need to restore justice for women in power
Advisor to the Russian Attorney General and former Deputy Attorney General State Duma and former prosecutor Crimea Natalia Poklonskaya Reacting to the statement by the Rector and High Priest of the Life-Giving Trinity Church in Hohli Andrei Tkachevthey are against equal rights and responsibilities for men and women. Poklonskaya on this wrote In your Telegram channel.
Poklonskaya’s criticism of Tkachev
The lawyer called Tkachov’s reasoning hypocritical. In her opinion, such remarks are an offense to all Russian women, who “have equal rights with men, but without losing their natural femininity and tenderness.” In her opinion, women need power to restore justice.
I will answer the question of why “women are in power” – so that there is justice, no need to carry concrete, mothers kill themselves in men’s jobs to support their families. Instead of “handing over documents”, losing the happiness of family life
At the same time, men should not “lose their natural qualities as defenders of the worthy and noble” nor “bring women to the state where they are forced to lay asphalt on roads” while “promoting medieval values” or sharing “power.”
High Priest Sees Women’s Calling in Family Life
In a sermon published on his YouTube channel, Tkachov said that the woman “has been a housewife and homemaker all her life” and is also a source of “wisdom, worldly cunning and a certain knowledge”. In his opinion, she “should have become a family doctor”. In addition, a woman should also support her family with “two grains of millet in hand and a piece of lard”.
related materials:
Later, women began to demand equality, voting rights, and then “they wanted to be in power for some reason.” The pastor wondered why a woman needed power and “what power she needed to warm her and make her feel good.” He questioned why one should become a representative if “they love you, you have kids, you have nothing to do, or whatever.”
In early July, Tkachov said that Russian women No In his view, abortion should not be performed because women don’t know who might be born – “maybe someone great”.
State Duma criticizes Tkachev’s views
Chairman of the State Duma Committee on Family Protection, Paternity, Maternity and Childhood Issues Nina Ostanina Talk to RTVI Carry Tkachev’s statement was about “the previous century, the period before 1917.” She stressed that according to the Russian Constitution, men and women have been equal since 1918.
It has nothing to do with happiness or having children. A mother with children can be a good politician or businessperson, or a good housewife.
In turn, the First Deputy Chairman of the State Duma Education Committee Jana Lantratova Pointing out that both men and women should be involved in politics, she stressed that they “have a maternal feeling, a special intuition”. In addition, women “think differently and understand what is missing”.
Putin talks about unique role of women in Russia
Russian women Play Russian President Vladimir Putin said it was a special role. He expressed surprise at how they managed to combine career and family. He believed that in the country followIncrease the number of women in leadership positions.
There is an overall under-representation of women in management positions at all levels
Putin recognizes the country’s interest in solving demographic problems and welcomes Russian women to have children. famousWomen’s rights must be respected.
Entering the State Duma in 2023 Contributed A bill that would exclude private clinics from the list of medical institutions authorized to perform abortions. The initiative’s authors say its goal is to increase the birth rate.
However, later the State Duma Committee spoke Oppose the bill. Putin says Russia’s birth rate is falling connected As society, economy, technology, culture and values change.
In turn, the Russian government saw The ban on abortions in private clinics violates women’s rights. The Cabinet of Ministers stressed that the proposed changes do not meet the constitutional standards for restricting citizens’ rights and freedoms.
[ad_2]
Source link
