Broadcast United

The consequences of the cultural genocide against Montenegrins: Did we turn into cattle long ago?

Broadcast United News Desk
The consequences of the cultural genocide against Montenegrins: Did we turn into cattle long ago?

[ad_1]

Screenwriter: Tijana Lopicic

Cultural genocide is the systematic destruction of cultural elements of a region, combined with the suppression of a group’s identity, with the goal of preventing the transmission of identity and traditions to future generations.

The implementation of cultural genocide is one of the key elements of hybrid warfare, as it destroys the identity of a group without the use of weapons. Countries like Montenegro, which do not have an effective strategy to protect their national interests, become easy prey. Due to the irresponsibility of previous governments, a suitable basis for the expansion of genocidal ideology was created, and due to politicians who only care about their armchairs and “service banks”, we are sinking deeper and deeper into the horror of Greater Serbia and the realization of the “Serbian World”.

The key problem is not the numerous Greater Serbia projects implemented since the 19th century, nor how they are institutionally implemented to this day. The problem is that in the 21st century the level of critical reflection has been reduced to a minimum, which greatly benefits the work of the Serbian Church. In addition to the lack of serious strategies to prevent these criminal enterprises, the education system is listed as one of the essential links. In this way, victims of cultural genocide are successfully created, who are hostile to their own people and country.

Novak Djokovic is a classic example of a victim of cultural genocide: the uneducated tennis player stood in front of the banner of the Chetnik criminal movement that killed half of his family

A typical example is Novak DjokovicDespite his impressive achievements in sports, intellectually we can classify him as a person without sharpness and critical thinking. We witnessed his “lightning charge” phase, and now we are faced with the absurd obsession with mythology Jovan Dretic Initiator of the project “Serbian World”.

Before the census, Greater Serbian-Chetnik chauvinists used the image of the athlete Djokovic to send a message to citizens not to forget their ancestors. The absurdity is that Djokovic seems to have forgotten who his ancestors were. Let us remind you that his great-grandfather’s brother declared himself a Montenegrin national when filling out immigration forms in the United States in 1906. Thus, Djokovic, a descendant of Montenegrin ancestors, became one of the most extreme Serbs, a victim of cultural genocide.

It is easy to manipulate uneducated citizens when history is studied selectively. Documents from the worst times of corruption will be constantly shown, or falsified, but questions about what happened before will never be asked.

Novak and his great-grandfather (after whom he is named), who claims to be Montenegrin

I want victims of cultural genocide to ask themselves the following questions:

  • Why are they in Serbia Yearbook From 1826, published by Mati Kasperska, referring to Montenegrins as Slovenes rather than Serbs?
  • Why did Serbia emerge during the reign of the Petrović-Njegoš dynasty? Who were Petrović’s secretaries, teachers, professors, editors and journalists? Why did Serbia send Serbian agents to Montenegro to hold these positions? What was their agenda?
  • Why did the secretaries (Serbian agents) of the Petrovich dynasty often forge documents, the most famous of which was the “Prince Danilo Code” forged by Milorad Medaković?
  • If Montenegrins allegedly did not exist at the time, why was it that in 1777 the scimitar of Governor-General Jovan Radonić was inscribed with “Sie nozh ot Jovan Radonjić, Governor-General of the entire Montenegrin nation”?
  • Why are the data of the 1909 census constantly falsified, entirely on the basis of religion, and not even disputed by historians who can be classified as Greater Serbian chauvinists?
  • The four-fire emblem on Montenegrin hats was first enforced during the Serbian occupation in 1918. Why was it glorified? What were the characteristics of Montenegro before?
  • As they litigate and defend the occupied church in Montenegro, what is written in the 1922 Tomos that Aleksandar Karađorđević purchased for 1.5 million francs? Does Tomos refer to the independent Montenegrin Orthodox Church that allegedly never existed?
  • When did the Nas (Montenegrin) language start to become Serbian? Was there a period of attempts to force Ekavization?

Recently, a priest of the Serbian Church said that “women do not need to think”, but this applies not only to women, but also to all submissive believers who are deprived of the freedom of critical reflection due to fear. We live in an era in which the Nazi Goebbels’s ideas are being realized: “Deprive the people of their history, in the first generation they will become like a mob, in the second generation you will be able to rule them like cattle.” And whether we have already become cattle, you can judge for yourself.

[ad_2]

Source link

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *