[ad_1]
“Surachet Praweenwongwut” hits back at Pheu Thai’s claim that public transport has been fragmented. Therefore, the CPP law was overturned. The truth about the budget for hiring consultants in 2025 was revealed. I suggest asking the people, one year after the government was established, has the local public transport improved? Looking back, I asked when there would be good buses in the local area.
Date: August 29, 2024 Mr. Surachet Praweenwongwut People’s Party List MP expressed his views on the Pheu Thai case. Communicate through online social Although there will be a resolution by the majority party in the House of Representatives yesterday not to accept the principle of the draft amendment. People’s Party Land Transport Law But I would like to confirm that the Pheu Thai government has promoted the local public transportation system. In the past, additional local powers have been granted in various ways.
Surakiart said that what the Pheu Thai Party announced was not accurate and was misunderstood in many ways. He wanted to clarify four issues: The first issue was that the Pheu Thai Party claimed that in the past, the government issued Ministerial Decree No. 64 (2024) to authorize local administrative agencies to participate in the operation of the public transportation system on their own. But the reality is that the above-mentioned ministerial decree only stipulates the method. “Please take action” It is not “Empowering Action” As a result, the power structure remains the same, concentrated in the central government state. If local governments want to provide public bus services in the area, let them do it. “please” It depends on the specific situation.
The second point is that the Pheu Thai Party claims that the central government has transferred the power to determine fares and issue operating licenses to provincial committees in accordance with the 1979 Land Transport Act. But the reality is that the current power structure is based on the last paragraph of Article 20 of the Land Transport Act: the determination of licenses and fares “must be approved by the Central Land Transport Control Committee. This means that it must be approved by the provincial party committee, which has little to do with the local people, and it must be approved by the central government. It is just like the previous centralized power.
The third point is that the Pheu Thai Party claims that the 2025 budget being considered by the House of Representatives has set up a project to study the government subsidy model for public transportation. And promote the potential for local areas to have their own sustainable public transportation system. Mr. Surachet said that this part of the budget is just to hire a “consultant” worth 10 million baht, and it will take another year to get the results of the study. This is a budget in accordance with the bureaucracy. This is not the initiative of the Pheu Thai Party. This is different from the People’s Party, which studies how to change the power structure to benefit people everywhere to the greatest extent, until it was proposed as a draft amendment to the specific land transport law but was ultimately rejected by the coalition government. There is not even any specific offer for comparison.
The last point is claimed by the Pheu Thai Party “Everything is ongoing. It’s not that the government is not doing anything. If we revisit this issue at that time, it won’t be too late. In a more complete and comprehensive way.” Mr Surachet said this was not hard to prove. Try asking people, this government has been in place for a year, with a Thai-style approach to decentralised transport. Has public transport improved in everyone’s area?
“The dream of locals is to have good quality buses. How long must I wait? If the government is not sincere about decentralisation,” Mr Surachet concluded.
[ad_2]
Source link
