[ad_1]
The news of Jalili’s meeting with a group of MPs and cabinet members of the 13th government came a week after the cabinet announced the list of ministers proposed to parliament and the visits of the proposed ministers to various committees, and just a day before the public review of the qualifications of the proposed ministers.
But is it necessary for Jalili’s meeting with his representatives to be in line with the proposed cabinet’s position? Member of Parliament Abolfazl Zahrawand, one of the activists at Jalili’s election headquarters during the elections, told Khabar Online News Agency that everyone has the right to hold such meetings.
Zahravand also clarified that Jalili did not talk about the proposed minister and like any other political trend, he wanted to use his influence to cast a vote of confidence in the proposed minister.
The silence of the MP, who is close to Jalili, on Qalibaf’s neutrality during the management of the qualification review meeting may also be meaningful, especially when he said “I will not say anything now, I will make an assessment tomorrow”.
In the conversation between Khabaronline news agency and Abolfazl Zahravand, Tehran People’s Representative of the Islamic Council and one of Jalili’s supporters of the presidential election, you will read:
*Mr Zorawande! The fourth day of the Cabinet-proposed review of ministerial competence has concluded. What do you think the atmosphere in Parliament is like?
In the past few days, we have reviewed the positions, plans, abilities and personalities of the proposed ministers, and this process is still ongoing. We have also heard the committee’s report, what their evaluation is, and on the other hand, opponents and supporters will also present their views. God willing, there will be a vote tomorrow, in which we will know what the representatives think about the proposed cabinet ministers. But now we are evaluating these abilities.
Delegates want maximum interaction with the government
* How do you evaluate the statements made by some members of the Islamic Revolutionary Faction in support of the National Unity Government?
The significance of the deputies’ move is not that the parliament voted unanimously in favor of the proposed cabinet formation, but that the deputies want to maximize interaction and help form a cabinet as quickly as possible, with one government and one government. Mr. Mezikian began his work.
But do not forget two key components, one is having work and professional qualifications, which must be seen in the proposed minister’s program and Q&A, and the other point is the criteria and standards proposed by the leadership of the parliamentary meeting; therefore, the proposed ministers must thoroughly believe in the holy Islamic system and they must have a good and clean record. The next point about the necessary conditions is related to scientific, professional and experimental qualifications.
Words from Saeed Jalili on the proposed doctors cabinet meeting
Some people said no, but they voted for it
*Given that you said there is a possibility that Parliament may not vote for all nominated ministers, which nominated ministers do you think may not receive a vote of confidence from Parliament? For example, how would you assess the situation of proposed ministers such as Mr. Atabek or Ms. Sader?
It is wrong to say anything now because there is no accounting. I am new myself and I have to see how it goes because some people say against but they voted for and vice versa so we have to see what happens tomorrow and then analyze why Minister so and so voted. Minister so and so did not vote.
Qalibaf has power among representatives that can act like a political party
* Some media belonging to the radical movement claim that Qalibaf is biased towards the proposed cabinet. Do you think Qalibaf can fairly manage the meetings related to the review of the proposed cabinet ministers?
After all, if he has views that he supports, then he has influence among the representatives, can influence their votes, and behave like a party if he supports it. In this case, this is natural, because during the presidential elections, a series of representatives allied with Qalibaf.
In general, in addition to the necessary and sufficient conditions for a vote of confidence in the proposed minister, there are also the influences of the parliament and factions inside and outside, so I said we will wait and see tomorrow. The results will be, and then we can comment on these issues.
* What is your opinion of the way Qalibaf has managed parliament so far in the meetings to vet ministerial qualifications? Is it fair?
I can give my assessment tomorrow, but I won’t say anything right now.
* News reports said Jalili held a meeting with a group of MPs on the proposed ministerial candidates. Were you also present at this meeting?
He convened a meeting to discuss the criteria that should be considered, and I attended that meeting.
Delegate weights will be determined tomorrow
* What issues were discussed during the meeting between Jalili and the delegates? Besides, why would a man like Jalili need to hold such a meeting?
Anyone has the right to do so, in any case, he is also a candidate with 14 million. As I said, in the end, all currents want to have an impact in some way, and this is normal. At present, many representatives belong to multiple parties and streams.
In short, we have to see what results we will get tomorrow, which will show which political tendencies are effective and efficient, and on the other hand, the weight of representation.
Jalili did not comment on ministerial candidates
* What criteria and guidelines were put forward for the vote of confidence in the proposed minister during the meeting with the representatives in Jalili?
This meeting did not talk about people, but more general things, such as whether to talk about the economy, what damages and needs our economy currently has, and what components should we expect; therefore, at the above-mentioned meeting, Jalili did not comment on the candidates for ministers.
[ad_2]
Source link
