Broadcast United

Paris medal quality is disappointing: How it compares to Tokyo medals

Broadcast United News Desk
Paris medal quality is disappointing: How it compares to Tokyo medals

[ad_1]

Skateboarder Nyjah Huston was among the United States to win a team bronze medal at the Paris Olympics. However, seven days after his success, Huston publicly criticized the quality of his medal.

Houston noted that his bronze medal is currently in “survived the war” condition, even though it was hung just seven days ago.

“These Olympic medals look great when they’re brand new, but after a little sweat from them on my skin and having my friends wear them over the weekend, it’s clear they’re not as high quality as you might think,” Houston said on social media.

The American later showed the medal to his fans on social media, revealing: “Even the front part is starting to ‘crown’. I think they should improve the quality of the medals,” the skateboarder added.

Viktor Axelsen, the Danish badminton player who won gold medals in Tokyo and Paris, spoke at the conference. He was one of the few people who could compare the appearance of the medals from the Tokyo and Paris Olympics, and the difference was incredible.

Despite being four years older, the Tokyo Olympic medals are in much better condition than the ones from the Paris Olympics a few days ago. Fans on social networks think that Tokyo’s is better because it has more gold than Paris’, but this is not the case because the standards are the same.

As for the gold medals, they are not entirely made of gold. Only in 1904, 1908 and 1912 were the medals made entirely of pure gold.

The International Olympic Committee stipulates that the material of the Olympic gold medal is six grams of pure gold. The remaining 523 grams used to make the gold medal is silver with a purity of at least 92.5%.

Daily News



[ad_2]

Source link

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *