[ad_1]
In the next chapter of his battle Alexandre de MoraisAfterwards, Elon Musk fired the entire team at Network X’s Brazilian office and declared that the network would not obey orders to block accounts and send user information. For now, it continues to operate, but will soon be shut down if it continues to fail to comply with regulations and pay fines.
Even if you make a mistake, The Supreme The last mistake was made. No company, Brazilian or foreign, can go against a court decision, no matter how unfair it may seem. In some blatantly unethical cases, the behavior of those who refuse to obey unjust laws and accept the consequences of their actions is admirable, even if it comes at great personal cost. What is the personal cost? MuskHis wealth will not be affected, and he will be further admired by the right-wing public he favors. His employees will pay for their jobs, and Brazilian users will face the possibility of service cuts.
Between the repeated predictions of a European civil war (or was it distorted?) and the harmless bravado Maduro He used the cause of free speech in Brazil as another banner. In April this year, he revealed some confidential orders that the TSE would issue in 2022. At that time, Musk made the most serious accusation against the TSE: X was not only ordered to suspend the account, but also publicly lied about the real reason for this suspension. So far, he has not presented evidence of the accusation.
In a new round, he refused to comply with the confidential order, except to disclose it, further fueling the narrative supporting the Supreme Court investigation: some on the Internet believe they are above Brazilian law.
Aside from Musk’s little show, the Supreme Court inquiry is also important. We’ve already had a week Revelation from Eduardo Taliaferro’s talk — who was then an expert on the Tokyo Stock Exchange’s advisory committee on combating false information — and Moraes’ assistant at the Supreme Court.
The decision to block the account was made first. A report justifying the block was then requested, produced and delivered. When the TSE expert himself did not see anything in the post justifying the precautionary measure –Like the example of Oeste magazine – Someone suggested that he take another look and “get creative”. Does Alexandre de Moraes, as Reporter of the Fake News Investigation, need a report from the TSE Special Counsel? No. He can attach the posts he deems relevant to the investigation and issue a blocking order. But then why should I ask for that? Is this just a drama to hide the fact that in all matters related to the Fake News Investigation (which has been going on since 2019), the only thing that matters is the will of Alexandre de Moraes, who is as fallible as any mortal?
The article published on Monday reported that Morais demanded data and blocked accounts that incited protests against him abroad. Where is the line between inciting a coup and legitimate protest? Criticism from the public is the first hurdle to removing that limit.
Brazil has experienced a real coup d’état. Prosecution of those responsible for blocking roads Pulse repetition frequency The second round of the day underscored this. The decisive action taken by the TSE that day – lifting the lockdown as the Labour Party demanded and refusing to extend the election – saved our democracy. Meanwhile, fake news investigations and digital militias remain a persistent source of dubious decisions, restrictions on freedoms have little basis, the informality of the process is embarrassing, and fuels growing skepticism about the Supreme Court. We need to get back to normal.
Link exists: Did you enjoy this text? Subscribers can access it seven times a day for free via any link. Just click on the blue F below.
[ad_2]
Source link
