[ad_1]
The post-election communication process has been marked by a lack of transparency from the National Electoral Council, which did not publish the minutes of the meeting that allegedly awarded the presidential victory to Nicolás Maduro. Official responses to the citizen effects of media and websites trying to verify the count, the murders of protesters disguised as “false alarms” by the Maduro government, and the dissemination of videos of past events as if they were recent have created a serious misinformation spiral.
(embedded in pzp1)
Misleading arguments against the meeting minutes released by the Democratic Unity Platform
On national television, Jorge Rodríguez disqualified the Democratic Unity Platform (PUD) from publishing a review supporting the victory of Edmundo González Urrutia, claiming that the ballots on the resultsconvzla.com page contained serious inconsistencies. However, their claims of forgeries, stains, signatures, mutilations, errors, and even dead voters have not been subjected to detailed technical scrutiny.
In his most baseless allegation, Rodriguez said the opposition’s website, which published the minutes of the meeting, showed its intention to create a «Parallel CNE» The lawsuit accuses Amazon founder Jeff Bezos of involvement because the domain is hosted on Amazon Web Services, which is available to anyone with a credit card, but that doesn’t imply a direct link to Bezos.
Likewise, Jorge Rodríguez and other pro-government communicators have assured that the opposition uses the ID cards of deceased persons to inflate the results on websites set up by the opposition. This claim is false, since the ID cards of deceased persons may appear in the electoral registry due to non-immediate updating, but do not indicate that they have voted.
In another narrative against the opposition review, Rodriguez showed some incomplete minutes and 5 other minutes without the signatures of the machine operator and/or the table witnesses. However, Article 342, paragraph 2 of the Organic Law on Administrative Procedure provides that the absence of one or more signatures in the minutes does not affect the validity of the minutes in any case.
Additionally, even if records are incomplete or poorly scanned, each person’s QR code allows the results to be audited based on the serial number it returns, which identifies the state, voting center, voting table, and the count received by each candidate.
(Related pzp1)
Maduro government concealed ‘Pimpina’s’ murder, describing it as a ‘false alarm’
On July 29, a photo of a young man in red flannel and covered in blood went viral on social networks, especially on X. The photo was allegedly of a murder victim in the Antimano Parish in Caracas. The photo was widely circulated during the protests in Venezuela, which broke out on July 28, when the presidential election was won by Nicolás Maduro.
On July 31, Nicolás Maduro denied the murder that took place in Antimano, saying it was a murder. False PositivesThe denial has been promoted by a network of communicators and pro-government activists since July 29. At a news conference, Maduro showed a video of a young man named Albert Giuseppe Salazar Alvarado “admit” Participated in a mock murder.
Maduro has accused the opposition of spreading false information to destabilize his government and sow chaos, saying it is part of a campaign to discredit his government and prevent the ruling party from maintaining power.
However, research conducted Fake News Hunter disclose The young man in the video is not the same person The person in the photo responded to the name of Aníbal José Romero Salazar, who was called “lead”was shot during a demonstration in Antimano Carapitta.
Family and friends “lead” Condemning the government’s version of the False Positives This was actually false information designed to cover up a real murder.
(Related pzp2)
Circulation of old and out-of-touch videos distorts the reality of the protests
The election results announced by the President of the National Electoral Commission have caused great social discontent, manifested in violent protests, intimidation and arbitrary arrests against politicians and civil society.
As a result, a large amount of false information has also been generated on social networks and instant messaging apps, and videos of past demonstrations, statements and arrests have been circulated, distorting the truth of the events.
On the night of the presidential election, July 28, a video was broadcast showing crowds walking on a boulevard in Caracas at night. The message claimed that citizens were going to the CNE, but the recording was made during a July 4 march in support of candidate Edmundo González.
Amid the civil-military tensions the country is experiencing, on July 29 a video went viral suggesting a mutiny by a group of military personnel at the National Guard Command in Cortiza, Caracas. However, the audiovisual content corresponds to the January 21, 2019 mutiny, which was led by Sergeant Luis Bandres Figueroa, who is serving a sentence of 15 years and six months.
Records of protests from 2017 were also shared on social networks as if they were the latest. In them, Gianni Scovino, a young man with autism, was attacked by a mixed committee of PNB and GNB in Lecerria, Anzoategui.
Even the torture scenes in Venezuelan movies Simon The recording was shared as authentic when the Maduro government announced that more than 1,000 people involved in the protests had been detained.
Publishing misleading or false content not only distorts the sociopolitical context the country is experiencing, but also puts politicians, activists, journalists and protesters in danger by inciting reactions based on misinformation.
[ad_2]
Source link
