[ad_1]
Dear Editor,
I am neither a lawyer nor a legal expert, but from my daily residential experience, I have observed some judicial decisions that deserve criticism.
People complain about the conduct of judges every day. Too many people complain about the delays in handling cases in the courts, too many people complain about the decisions of judges. Review and fair criticism has always been a method used by complainants and usually brings about redress.
We have been told time and again that judges are not above the law. We know that judges are paid from the public purse and are therefore accountable to the public. Judges often decide citizens’ liberties. The decisions they make can make a world of difference in people’s lives. So judges are not above criticism, and criticism of them is justified.
Unfortunately, whenever someone criticizes a judge or the judiciary, there is always a retort that judicial independence is under attack. Some media outlets are even afraid to publish criticism of judges or the judiciary because they are intimidated and fear the consequences.
Accountability is a two-way street. Why do ordinary people have to bear the consequences for their words, but judges are immune from criticism? As a layman, I am confused. I wonder under what circumstances can a judge be criticized? Now that I have said all this, do Judge Gino Persaud’s remarks not meet the threshold for criticism?
Sincerely,
Neil Kamal
[ad_2]
Source link
