[ad_1]
Written by Karma Kapaia
President Hichilema’s recent dismissal of the entire ACC board seems more like a cosmetic gesture than a real step towards accountability. Critics argue that he should have first examined his own corruption problems, which had made the board weak. Since taking office, President Hichilema has turned ACC into his personal fiefdom while positioning himself as a staunch advocate of transparency and a fighter against corruption. His stance has attracted international attention and even prompted comments from President Biden at the United Nations suggesting that he could be effective in combating corruption in Zambia. However, a closer look reveals a more disturbing reality. While he has boasted about his wealth, he has not produced any documents to confirm his personal integrity. Details about the companies or shares he owns remain shrouded in secrecy. This lack of transparency raises serious questions.
From the outset, concerns were raised about the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) under President Hichilema and his commitment to transparency. Critics, myself included, have long argued that President Hichilema was the poster child for corruption in Zambia. His rapid integration of oversight of accountability mechanisms, including the ACC, was seen as a strategic move to shield him and his associates from domestic and international scrutiny. Who can say we were wrong?
The opacity surrounding his business interests and financial assets undercut his claims of transparency. Many Zambians question whether corruption has really gone unchecked under his government, contrary to the image he presents to the world. His removal follows a clear pattern – anyone who demonstrates integrity and efficiency in their position is swiftly removed.
President Hichilema’s demands for loyalty from those who share his anti-corruption rhetoric contrast with his reluctance to respond to allegations against him and his allies. Dissent or criticism is quickly labeled corruption, highlighting double standards in accountability.
However, the wisdom of recent decisions, such as dissolving the coalition so soon before the upcoming elections, will be judged by history. While fear may temporarily suppress dissent, public sentiment can change quickly. Those who once submitted to Hichilema’s rule may become his strongest critics in the future. Zambians have a short memory.
President Hichilema must confront these challenges head on. Despite his efforts to gain international recognition, the opinions of ordinary Zambians cannot be ignored. Their final judgment on Hichilema’s presidency will have to wait until the 2026 elections. Threats and removals, while effective temporarily, will not forever protect him from the consequences of public discontent.
It is vital that we recognize that behind every person in uniform – be it a soldier, police officer or intelligence agent – is a family struggling to make ends meet. Hunger and corruption are inextricably linked. President Hichilema has ignored this lesson. As long as people struggle to survive, they are likely to resort to corrupt practices just to live another day. Ultimately, everyone is a victim and contributor to corruption. The fight against hunger and corruption are interlinked. The 2026 elections will test the resolve of the people and their desire for transparent and accountable leadership.
President Hichilema should address these issues sooner rather than later, or public opposition could intensify, leading to a volatile political future, just as other African countries have faced problems of governance and public discontent. I will be watching closely.
[ad_2]
Source link
