[ad_1]
This doesn’t seem like a very radical proposal. Many people already receive all their mail digitally, not just from the government but also from companies where they are customers.
But this development presents an opportunity if politicians are willing and aware of the seriousness.
Sweden has very strong principles of advocacy. Income, car ownership, property ownership, pets, inheritance records are all examples of information held by the authorities. A wealth of information is available to anyone who wants to investigate people for dishonest purposes.
Moreover, some companies make all this content more accessible in their databases under the auspices of Free Speech Laws, which override the EU’s strict GDPR rules. At the push of a button, all the content is available on the screen.
Politicians want to block these companies, and there is an ongoing investigation into the matter. But this won’t change the underlying problem, which is that many types of personal data are publicly available in Sweden.
This is where digital mailboxes come into play. If physical addresses are no longer necessary for mail distribution, the addresses themselves should at least remain confidential. Here’s an example: it might be good to know who owns a certain car – for example, if you’re planning to trade it in. But do you have to know where the owner lives? Do you even need to know exactly where people live?
Giving anyone who has an email address registered with the authorities the option to have their address classified in the civil registry would increase security at a stroke for those who fear crime. Today, the requirements for obtaining a protected address are very high.
Just because the authorities have to know where you live, not everyone has to know. In order to build a safer Sweden and better protect personal integrity, the next reform should be the introduction of an opt-out function for a public address register.
[ad_2]
Source link
