[ad_1]
This picture of a polarized country, one of the axes of Chavismo, or the picture of a society split into very similar parts that occurred when Nicolás Maduro came to power in 2013, has been left behind when analyzed in detail. The election results on July 28 last yearthe opposition made the data available to the public.
As part of its strategy to prove fraud in the country, The “Venezuela Command”, led by María Corina Machado and aimed at promoting the presidential candidacy of Edmundo González Urrutia, has placed 83.5% of the electoral records from the July 28 elections on the Internet. Nine days after voting, the National Electoral Council (CNE) does not show any results or data.
Economist Omar Zambrano commented to DIARIO DE CUBA after carefully reviewing and analyzing the data made public by the Venezuelan opposition: On July 28, Venezuela’s electorate polarization and social divisions were brokenPolitical analysts unanimously point out that the essence of this vote is a political phenomenon, which Chavismo is still unwilling to accept.
“For the first time in 25 years, voting is no longer divided along socioeconomic linesCandidacy Edmundo González Urrutia will win in all socioeconomic sectors of the countryeven in the regions with the most social vulnerability and the highest incidence of multidimensional poverty, where the opposition has not won since 1998,” Zambrano said.
The latest results released by the opposition command on Tuesday showed 67% of the votes went to González Urrutia, 30% to Maduro. Meanwhile, the CNE insists that Maduro will be re-elected in the 2025-2031 period with 51.95% of the vote, while the opposition candidate received 43.18%. However, until this Tuesday, the only records that could be verified and collated from each polling station were those received, counted, scanned and uploaded to the internet by Venezuela’s pro-democracy opposition.
In the absence of a result from the CNE, the Maduro government’s strategy is to judicialize the electoral issue. Go to the Supreme Courtmost magistrates are openly pro-Chavismo.
“Edmundo González Urrutia’s lead would reach 37.15 percentage points, the largest electoral margin in Venezuela’s presidential election history since the restoration of democracy in 1958” said economist Zambrano, who ruled out the 2018 presidential election because the opposition did not participate in that election.
The opposition’s strategy was to quickly release the minutes of the July 28 meeting so that they could be downloaded from anywhere in the world, which helped strengthen the opposition’s arguments. CNE acted fraudulently in declaring Maduro’s victory.
For example, the analysis of the US agency Associated Press (AP) Venezuela’s election records “show its candidates Edmundo González Urrutia received far more votes in the election than the government acknowledged“, after only numerical analysis, “it is concluded Serious doubts about official announcement of President Nicolas Maduro’s victory“July 28th.
The Associated Press processed nearly 24,000 election record images, representing the results of 79% of voting machines. Each piece of paper contained a vote count encrypted in a QR code, which the Associated Press decoded and analyzed using software to come up with a count of 10.26 million votes.
International universities and renowned newspapers (e.g. “Washington post”.
For Zambrano, based on more than 83 percent of the minutes, the outcome for the opposition candidate — a 74-year-old former diplomat who until four months ago was completely unknown to the Venezuelan public — “would be arithmetically impossible.” Reversal.
Economist Zambrano points out that in the breakup of the polarization on which Chavez’s hegemony was based for many years, there are no longer states (provinces) with one or another political tendency, because According to the published minutes, the opposition will win in all regions of the country.
Among Venezuelans, most who voted for change did not distinguish between rural and urban people, or between people in Caracas and the rest of the country. Edmundo González Urrutia’s victory is actually national.
According to Zambrano’s analysis, voters who have historically supported the ruling United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) will not follow the usual trend of voting for Maduro’s re-election: “The share of the PSUV vote falls even more among the most socioeconomically vulnerable groups,” as well as in most rural areas.
Zambrano concluded in his analysis that these results suggest Political polarization appears to be left behind,exceeded The desire for change “is unified and extends across all regions, territories and social classes of the country”In his view, this would produce Venezuela’s new reality, beyond what is finally happening at the highest levels of power.
[ad_2]
Source link
