[ad_1]
This news has been read 144 times!
Colleague Salah Sayer said in a video that most Arab countries are not truly Arab and the concept of an “Arab nation” is just a myth.
He criticized supporters of Arab unity, whose ideology is based on shared history, geography, religion, language and other factors.
Al-Sayer’s research shows that “Arab history” is fragmented and cannot be universally applied or believed. For example, he questions the commonalities between the histories of Lebanon, Morocco, Sudan and Yemen.
He believes that the existence of a common history between two neighboring countries is a common natural phenomenon around the world and is not limited to Arab countries.
Al Sayyel believes that geographical proximity is also meaningless. He compares the Arab world to South America, where countries share similar characteristics, languages, heritage, religions and traditions but do not feel the need to unite under a chauvinistic nationalist impulse. He questions why Arabs should strive for unity despite their vast differences.
Regarding religion, Al-Sayer noted that these shared religious beliefs do not necessarily unite groups. He cited the example of the more than 1.4 billion Catholics and other Christians who do not constitute a unified entity.
“There are various sects and groups within Islam, and many Arab countries have large non-Muslim minorities.” He believes that if Syria and Iraq unite on the basis of religion, millions of non-Muslims, including Christians, Jews, Druze, Baha’is and Alawites, will be marginalized.
“Al-Sayer also questioned the notion that a common language is a unifying factor. He compared the Arab world to Francophone countries, which all speak French but have little else in common, noting that France, as a former colonizer, leads the cultural group. He doubted that a common language alone would lead countries to support each other militarily.
“He believed that Arab unity and Arab nationalism were originally British and French ideas to create a military entity to confront the Ottoman Turks and were partially achieved through the Arab Revolt.
“Arab Christians, fearing that they might be marginalized by the preponderance of Muslims, played a major role in promoting Arab nationalism, which focused primarily on unifying Egypt, Iraq, and the Levant, while marginal regions such as the Arabian Peninsula, Sudan, and North Africa were largely excluded.
“Al-Sayer highlights the cultural, aspirational, physical and traditional differences between Arab countries. He argues that uniting these diverse nations under one umbrella will not change their collective status.
Instead, he advocated that each country focus on its own scientific, cultural, and financial development before considering a potentially unattainable unification. He concluded that a small, wealthy country was unlikely to merge with a large, economically troubled country.
“For example, Jordan, which supported Saddam Hussein’s invasion of Kuwait, would not accept merging with Sudan but might consider merging with an equally small but wealthy country. Ultimately, he insisted, practical interests, not nationalist sentiment, should guide these decisions.”
e-mail: [email protected]
Author: Ahmed alsarraf
This news has been read 144 times!
[ad_2]
Source link
