[ad_1]
The Chairman of the Education Disciplinary Committee, Prof. Dr. Cihad Demirli, gave a speech on the new curriculum system.
Demily said that in response to the need for curriculum reform, we studied international reports and measurement and evaluation studies worldwide, and said: “It has been determined that our country’s curriculum, especially the content of some courses, is very strong, and the report is in this regard. In the evaluation we carried out together with the General Directorate, we followed the research in developed countries with our contemporaries and tried to reflect the simplification there in our program. It has brought not only simplification, but also a change in approach. Our programs will now be approached with a skills-based approach, which will meet the needs of our children and society,” and this will provide the basis for their design. The new needs of the world, “he said.
“67,000 284 comments were received. This is a dynamic process.”
Rector Demily indicated that the process of expressing opinions in the preparation of the new curriculum dates back to 2013, and said: “Since the study of the National Education Quality Framework, monitoring and evaluation studies have been ongoing. The result of the Ministry of National Education on this subject is that when we included the Chairman of the Education Committee in these studies, we saw all the supervision of academics, national education experts, teachers, parents and others throughout the process. , We could use these studies as a basis for the development of the plan, and we tried to reflect the methods that emerged in our new curriculum, which many non-governmental organizations, our education stakeholders, universities presented to us in the form of official reports. At the same time, our citizens directly gave us their personal opinions, and we classified this information every day and shared it with the relevant general directorates. We shared it with our own experts and committees. We evaluated every day. “Even during the suspension, we did not stop the evaluation meetings and the efforts to reflect it in the plan,” he said.
“Monitoring and evaluation continues”
Mayor Demily said that the process of expressing opinions is sufficient for experts on the subject, “ultimately, experts on the subject can easily monitor and see the points and changes they will focus on when reviewing these documents. Questions about duration can always be on our agenda. In addition, the monitoring and evaluation of the training continues. “The Education Committee will continue to monitor the implementation of these programs. The planning departments of the relevant general directorates will continue to supervise. “It is a dynamic process, this updating work is an ongoing issue, it is not a new current issue,” he said.
Noting that the new curriculum uses an original, skills-based approach, President Demily said their goal is for students to apply what they have learned, especially national and moral values, as virtuous people for the benefit of humanity, while putting their skills into practice. President Demily stressed that the most important innovation brought by the curriculum is “school-based” planning, saying: “Differentiation that takes into account the individual characteristics of students has come to the fore. Our teachers are now better able to observe the individual characteristics of students and develop differentiated support or enrichment activities accordingly.” “This personal freedom is extremely important to us,” he said.
“Foreign language learning continues”
Demily said that there are no foreign language courses in the new curriculum system. “The admission notices we have received so far cover 26 courses, and there are no foreign language or English courses. However, the relevant directorates, here are the Directorate General of Basic Education and the Directorate General of Secondary Education, “They are working and preparing. Once the preparations are completed, they will submit them to us for evaluation. It is very likely that we will have completed the study of these courses in the near future.”
Demily said they present a more advanced and modern approach in the new curriculum, explaining that students will be able to adapt faster to current courses and “sports” in areas such as “artificial BroadCast Unitedligence” and “national defense.” “It deals with the development of children in a multifaceted way,” Demily said of the new curriculum. “So, at this point, we prioritize the overall goal, which is the development of children, which benefits society in a peaceful way,” said Demily. “Humanity, taking into account basic values. “
How will the grading transition occur?
Explaining how the transition will be gradual, Demily said: “Starting next year, when it is implemented in pre-school, first grade of primary school, fifth grade of secondary school and ninth grade of high school, monitoring studies will also continue. “This is already normal in the education system. “So the process will be realized when we actively monitor the feedback obtained from teachers here and develop part of the plan. This plan will not be adopted in all classes in the entire education system. After all, it will take about 4 years for the entire plan to be implemented in the education system. “The process is dynamic and there will definitely be updates during this period,” he said.
Why was Integral removed from the curriculum?
In response to criticism of the new curriculum, particularly regarding the removal of integral calculus as a math subject from the curriculum, DeMille said:
“At this point, I really hope that those who have made criticisms will re-evaluate and re-read our program. Integral is one of the very important subjects in mathematics. When you look at it as a scientific field, it is a subject in the second semester. However, in our curriculum, there is another aspect, which is a subject in the second semester: although. Simplifying the content, we start from the second semester of grade 12 to examine whether one subject is a precursor to another subject, and when we compare our students’ learning of integrals and derivatives of limits, we can say that it is not. After discussing with field experts and academicians, we have come to the conclusion that it would be more appropriate to offer this course to students who want to continue with a science and mathematics-oriented engineering education at the undergraduate or associate degree level. We have seen this in the scientific studies conducted on this subject. This also affects the way children think about mathematics. When we conducted these studies, we made this decision together with academicians, mathematics teachers, field experts and teachers. These discussions are also not for today, but for a gradual transition four years later. When our students continue to higher education, if they intend to continue with an associate degree or undergraduate degree in engineering, mathematics and science, they will have learned the application of this knowledge in their own field. “There is no simplification here that can form the basis for a major debate. ”
[ad_2]
Source link
