[ad_1]
The former Supreme Court (CSJ), chaired by Silvia Valdés, has been in office for nearly two terms. It is noteworthy that according to the convicted former vice president Roxana Baldetti Elias, she and the former criminal Manuel Baldizón negotiated the leadership of the judiciary (OJ). Apparently, negotiations required the acquiescence of designated persons, who paid for the favors granted with their own resolutions.
It is time to once again join the Nomination Committee to appoint candidates for the CSJ and the Appeals Chamber. With this, the evil game of trying to occupy these spaces in the interests of corruption and impunity agreements has returned. The Criminals’ Pact, since its birth nearly three decades ago, has begun to erode the weak pillars of the judicial reform process. In a way, they have allied with cartel criminals and misnamed political parties to control the legislature, the executive and finally the judiciary.
(frasepzp1)
The defeat of the agreement by citizens voting for the alternative in the executive temporarily unsettled the criminal groups, but did not completely paralyze them, and in this way they opposed with spears any attempt to correct the course from their trenches in the name of the Ministry of Public Affairs (MP).
While they block the executive branch, they seek at all costs to ensure that the cooperative state of the judiciary remains intact. In order not to take any risk, they apparently seek to prevent the Nominating Committee (CP) from performing its functions and carrying out procedures that allow the judiciary to be purged.
Despite being summoned by the legislature, the deans of the two law schools were absent from the swearing-in ceremony. The absence prevented the CP from being formally established and starting its functions. Both Francisco Marroquin University (UFM) and Mariano Galvez University (UMG) failed to ensure the presence of their representatives, namely the deans of their respective law schools, at the swearing-in ceremony.
Apparently, the president of the UMG was not in the country, which could be the reason for his absence. Meanwhile, someone from the UFM, instead of explaining his absence, resigned from the post of president at the last minute, apparently leaving the entity he leads without a head. Everything could obviously be an accident if it were not for the fact that behind the UFM, at least its Board of Trustees, there are interest groups close to judicial resolutions that support impunity.
Therefore, the absence of members and the inability to properly seat the CP can only lead to a prolongation of the process of appointing candidates to the CSJ and the Appeals Chamber, or, in the worst case, a suspension of the process, which could be interpreted as defeating the justice by preventing compliance with the procedures required by law.
The authorities of these academic centres, who are working to include their educational corporations in the Higher Education Commission, are answering questions about the real reason for the absence of their officials.
[ad_2]
Source link
