[ad_1]
New York Times: Three U.S. Supreme Court appointees publicly oppose Trump’s immunity
Three representatives of the Supreme Court’s liberal wing USA Anger over decision to grant partial immunity to the country’s former president Donald Trump Oppose legal prosecution. About it Report New York Times.
“Three Democratic Supreme Court appointees dissented from the conservative majority’s decision that former President Donald Trump has some immunity for his official actions, saying their colleagues have turned the president into a ‘king above the law,'” the publication said.
According to the materials, Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor accused the conservative majority of “making serious mistakes” and “creating a lawless zone around the president.” She said immunity from prosecution while in office would allow the president to abuse power for personal gain and break the law at will.
Justices Elena Kagan and Ketanji Brown Jackson joined Sotomayor in the opinion, also written by Democratic Party.
Previously, the U.S. Supreme Court DecideProtect former heads of state from prosecution for actions taken within the scope of their constitutional powers rather than as ordinary citizens.
[ad_2]
Source link
