[ad_1]
Words and mouth sewn were once Ram Durmia’s motto. However, on Tuesday, he took an oath to clear all the charges against him. He also disputed the possible decision to push him into early retirement by asking for early retirement. Judicial Reviewsubmitted yesterday.
We remember the unfortunate Berard incident in January. Berard then brought the Director of the Mauritius Meteorological Service. Ram Dhurmea through Mr Gavin Glover, Senior Legal Advisorsought a judicial review of the decision of Local Government and Disaster and Risk Management Minister Anwar Husnoo in the Supreme Court.
Ram Dhurmea discussed the events related to weather forecasting during the development of Tropical Cyclone Belal. He said that at about 4 am on January 13, Cyclone Belal was named and was located at 15.2 degrees South longitude and 55.5 degrees East latitude, about 580 km north-northwest of the coast of Mauritius. Ram Dhurmea said that the cyclone, which was at a distance at that time, posed a threat and needed to be closely monitored. “I also informed the Prime Minister and Minister Husno at around 10.30am that Berard was scheduled to pass closest to Mauritius the next day, January 16, about 60-70 km off the coast of Riambel. My advice and observations on Berard’s trajectory on January 14 were consistent with the advice and advisories issued by the National Emergency Operations Command. It was just that Deputy Prime Minister Husno’s public remarks were inconsistent with the full advice I had given at the National Crisis Committee (NCC) meeting. The Minister only mentioned the first possible scenario that I had mentioned earlier in the NCC briefing and did not inform the public of the other two possibilities that would maintain the potential threat posed by Berard.””, protested the 49-year-old.
“I was suspended on January 17, 2024 and was never asked to provide an explanation. However, in a letter dated July 23, I was asked to explain why I should not be forced to retire in the public interest and I provided my explanation.“The main person concerned said as he drew up a chronology of events. As a reminder, Minister Husnu insisted that Durmeia would have Regarding the “inaccurate information provided” about Cyclone Berar, the latter would add that “the Category 1 Cyclone Warning in force at this given time (January 14, 2024) may be removed in the four o’clock bulletin on Monday, January 15, 2024, and he has made it clear that in the worst case scenario, he will maintain the Category 1 Cyclone Warning for four hours on January 15, 2024.
Ram Durmi is waiting for the disciplinary committee to explain himself. He also wrote a letter to the cabinet secretary and the head of the civil service system on January 16, asking for the establishment of the system as soon as possible. But he was suspended on January 17 and then asked to retire early. However, in a letter on July 23, Senior Chief Executive Officer The Ministry of Local Government (SCE) told him that an independent investigation, extracts of which were conveyed to him, showed that he had failed to perform his duties as the station chief of the weather station. Ram Dhurmea allegedly failed to properly inform the NCC on the progress of the Berar storm. He has 14 days to convince the SCE in writing why he should not retire early in the interest of public service. He reportedly refuted the allegations in two letters to the SCE dated August 5 and 7. He also requested in his letter dated August 5 that he be provided with the minutes of the meeting and the full video record, as well as the report referred to in the July 23 letter.
Administrative overreach
Ram Dhurmea questioned the government’s excessive actions. He asked the court to authorize the order Transfer The defendants were ordered to submit all files, documents related to their development process and the decision of July 23 to the Supreme Court and the applicant was asked to file an explanation as to why the applicant should not be the subject of disciplinary proceedings. Ram Dhurmea said that it was in the interest of public service to retire him on the grounds that the above decision-making process and the defendants’ decision of July 23 were unfair and unreasonable.
According to the affidavit, Section 39 of the Criminal Procedure Code Public Service Regulations (PSR) allows the Chief of Staff and the Public Service Commission to take decisions to allow civil servants to retire early in the interest of the public service. Ram Dhurmea gave his version of the facts. He was said to have informed the NCC on several occasions about the imminent danger posed by Berar. He even maintained that the very active cumulonimbus clouds associated with Berar would lead to floods. But he found himself before a committee more concerned about the impact of closing day care centres on absenteeism than predicting and preparing for future floods. Section 39 of the PSR was said to be in violation of the rules of natural justice, biased and unreasonable and therefore should be reviewed. He demanded a fair trial. The trial could set a precedent in dismissals in the public sector.
[ad_2]
Source link
