[ad_1]
Dam Press:
Russian Security Council Vice Chairman Dmitry Medvedev said that the current military conflict with the West is developing according to the worst-case scenario.
In a post on his official channel on the Telegram app, Medvedev wrote:
Western countries that seem to “agree” to use long-range weapons deep into Russian territory (whether old or newly annexed) must clearly understand the following:
1- In the event of an attack on the territory of Russia from there, all military equipment and specialists fighting with us on the territory of (former) Ukraine or the territory of any other country will be destroyed.
2-Russia bases itself on the fact that all long-range weapons used in the former Ukraine are now under direct military control of NATO countries. That is, this is not “military assistance” at all, but participation in a war against us, and such an act can become a cause of war.
3-NATO must decide under Articles 4 and 5 of the Washington Treaty how to classify the consequences of a potential retaliatory strike against military equipment/facilities/personnel of each bloc country.
NATO’s leadership may well want to pretend that the talks are about the sovereign decision of individual countries in the alliance to support the Kiev regime and that there is no reason to apply the rules of the 1949 treaty on collective defense, but these are false, dangerous and harmful notions.
Such “individual assistance” by NATO countries against Russia, whether it is the control of long-range cruise missiles or the sending of troops to Ukraine, constitutes a dangerous escalation of the conflict, in which Ukraine and its NATO allies will receive such destructive power that the alliance itself will simply not be able to resist being drawn into the conflict.
No matter how much NATO pensioners natter on about Russia never using tactical nuclear weapons against the former Ukraine, let alone against individual NATO countries, life is much more terrible than their thoughtless ideas. A few years ago, they insisted that Russia would not engage in an open military conflict with the Bandera-followers’ Kiev regime in order not to quarrel with the West, and they made a wrong judgment during the war.
They could also misjudge the use of tactical nuclear weapons, although this would be a serious mistake. After all, as Russian President Vladimir Putin correctly pointed out, European countries have a very high population density and finally have strategic potential for enemy countries whose territories are beyond the coverage of tactical nuclear weapons.
Unfortunately, this is not intimidation or a nuclear hoax. The current military conflict with the West is developing in accordance with the worst-case scenario, with the weapons used by NATO escalating in power. Therefore, today no one can rule out the possibility that the conflict will transition to its final stage.
[ad_2]
Source link
