[ad_1]
Also read | The Theron brothers are protected by the laws they promote to eliminate crime
The tensions began on Tuesday when Santibanez called the group a “thorn in the citizen’s side.” Then, on Wednesday night, he said in a conversation with the RPP that “in some cases, the public sector is actually the enemy of the police.”
“A lot of times we have concerns about the conduct of the public sector in certain activities, because I have been very critical on this issue, and it turns out that in some cases, or it appears to be the enemy of the police or the public,” The head of the interior department said.
On Thursday, he noted that “the public ministry’s system is rotten” and urged Congress to reform the institution.
A few hours earlier, he declared to the media that the prosecutor’s office was “not committed to fighting crime.” This came after the release of a businessman kidnapped in Los Olivos.
(Photo: Andina)
This is not the first time that the minister has made harsh comments about the Public Ministry. For example, in June this year, in a conversation with Canal N, he stated that the Public Prosecutor’s Office “hurts citizens”. In addition, he claimed that “the public sector is not state power” and “it should not be given powers that have nothing to do with it”.
Also read | Nicanor Boluarte’s network directly interfered in the appointment of 47 governors and vice governors
On Friday, August 16, Villena expressed “outrage” and “humiliation” at Santibanez’s statements, noting that they came after the Public Ministry launched preliminary proceedings against him in July for alleged abuse of power.
“They tell us we are the enemy. Well, we prefer to be considered that, rather than good friends of the minister, the executive or those whom we have a constitutional obligation to investigate. As far as the attorney general’s office is concerned, we have an obligation to investigate high-ranking officials, and we are doing so,” Villena said on the same local radio station.
(Photo: Hugo Pérez / GEC)
/
The prosecutor explained that the initial case against Minister Santibanez alleged abuse of power due to “pretending to control a journalist” after the circulation of an audio clip and allegedly disciplining the police officer who leaked the audio clip.
“In fact, we are not surprised by the minister’s behavior, since recently the Public Ministry and the State Prosecutor’s Office have launched preliminary proceedings against the minister for the crime of abuse of power. This concerns the alleged control of a journalist, who we all know from the audio that was played, and he later ordered disciplinary action against the police officer who played it. This was reported recently in the last days of July, and since then we have seen every day that he does not miss an opportunity to speak and rant against the public sector,” The prosecutor said.
Vilaina therefore mentioned an alleged audio Broadcast by “La Encerrona” The interior minister allegedly asked to “control” the head of the media, journalist Marco Sifuentes. According to the “Cuarto Poder” of the police officer Junior Izquierdo, known as “Culebra”, the audio would have been played.
The Acting Attorney General also recalled that his office had filed about 30 constitutional complaints against various officials in the past six months, which is why he considered the minister’s criticism to be a “reaction” to the work they were doing.
He acknowledged, however, that the prosecutor’s office might “not have responded in time” to some cases, but that the public ministry and the judiciary “have control bodies” that must assess and sanction them.
replica
In a conversation with El Comercio, Santibanez reiterated his position and stressed that his department did not receive support from the Public Ministry when the businessman was rescued in Los Olivos, and that similar situations occurred in various operations in other parts of the country.
Likewise, he ruled out that his criticism of the prosecutor’s office was motivated by an investigation into him.
“Criticism of the Public Ministry does not exist today, so the argument put forward by the prosecutor that this is an investigation due to alleged abuse of power is a mockery. It seeks to negate the convincing arguments we had. The fact is that this once again confirms the need for reform. And the game must be played by the starters and not by the substitutes. “
“The prosecutor (Juan Carlos Villena) is unaware of the problems his agency is generating,” he added. Likewise, he assured that the Public Ministry “will not send prosecutors to the courts for active crimes.”
“He doesn’t stand for anything and the problem is, he hasn’t failed the police or the minister, he has failed the people.” He emphasized.
He added that despite his meeting with the acting attorney general, “criminals continue to be released.”
Also read | Vladimir Theron and a Fugitive’s Live Speech: Possible Criminal Implications for Councillors and Organizers
Opinion
In a conversation with El Comercio, former Interior Secretaries Ruben Vargas and Carlos Basombrio noted that the conflict affected the fight against organized crime and believed that Minister Santibanez was trying to distort the problems of his department and the investigation against him.
“The confrontation between the Minister of the Interior and the State Prosecutor greatly affects the fight against crime, because it is these two institutions that should have maximum cooperation and fluid communication. “These are the two institutions responsible for prosecuting and investigating crimes,” Vargas said.
The former minister believes that Santibanez “aims to divert attention from his incompetence and the government’s lack of direction in dealing with the development of organized crime and the non-capture of Vladimir Theron”.
“Parts of Santibanez’s statements could be the result of the investigation (carried out by prosecutors),” Vargas stressed.
For the former minister, the State Prosecutor has an obligation to defend its jurisdiction and the executive has a duty to respect the autonomy of the institution.
Also read | Daniel Uresti: Supreme Court approves the reasons for his conviction for the murder of Hugo Bustios
Basombrio pointed out that it had become a systematic practice for the interior minister to “blame others for his own problems.”
“He blamed the public authorities for delaying the capture of Theron, whereas they could have handled the matter if they had properly monitored the place as the police usually do,” Express.
He believes that holding other institutions and journalists responsible for the government’s difficulties in carrying out its responsibilities “sends a bad message.”
“Villaina responded appropriately in defense of his institution,” Basombriou said.
He also claimed that Minister Santiváñez has a “rather loose connection to ethics” and lacks “proper behavior,” so his use of the issue to “distort the investigation against him” would not “catch his attention.”
[ad_2]
Source link
