[ad_1]
This week, the Mexican state of Aguascalientes took an alarmingly retrogressive step on abortion, violating Mexico’s legal obligations.
One year ago, in August 2023, Mexico Supreme Court Order to legalize abortion AguascalientesAfter five o’clock Civil Society Several organizations — GIRE, CECADEC, Cultivando Género, Morras Help Morras and TERFU AC — challenged the abortion ban in the state’s criminal code. reform The state Criminal Code In December 2023, abortion will be legalized within the first 12 weeks of pregnancy.
but Approve this new lawbut Congress is now effectively banning abortion. The dramatic reduction in the number of weeks that women, girls, and pregnant women can legally obtain an abortion, from 12 weeks to 6 weeks, will severely limit access to this essential health care.
This change conflicts with Mexico’s obligations under international human rights law, including those regarding sexual and reproductive health, autonomy and non-discrimination. Restrictions on access to safe and legal abortion services could have many other consequences. The right to international protection At risk are the rights to life, health and information; the right to be free from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment; the rights to privacy, bodily autonomy and integrity; and the right to decide the number and spacing of children.
The six-week ban also contradicts a ruling by Mexico’s Supreme Court precedent The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends avoid Enact laws prohibiting abortion based on gestational age limits.
The six-week limit would effectively make abortions too difficult for many people to obtain because the time limit is too tight. It would disproportionately affect teenagers, people living in poverty, and people with disabilities. It would force people to make agonizing choices: forcing pregnant women to seek out-of-state care, get an abortion outside the health care system, or continue the pregnancy against their will.
This harmful law will now go to the desk of the governor of Aguascalientes. She should veto it.
[ad_2]
Source link
