[ad_1]
Enrique Márquez, former presidential candidate and former vice president of the CNE, filed this Tuesday a request for recusation from the president of the Electoral Commission of the Supreme Court (TSJ), saying that his “links” to the United Socialist Party of Venezuela (PSUV) compromise his impartiality in cases currently before the court.
In a statement to the media after the release of the TSJ, he stressed that he provided “conclusive evidence of how the President demonstrated her political connections” and stressed that “it is impossible for an official to impartially administer justice if she is involved in partisan activities.”
“He was even a councillor of the PSUV. I do believe that there is enough evidence that he cannot be involved in this case. There is convincing evidence to prove this, because the speaker of the elections did not hide her political connections, either in the past or now, and it is difficult for the judges (very bad for female judges) to reveal her political connections. If she does not do so, justice will be served “It is fair,” Marquez said.
He announced that the appeal had been received, but clarified that he had not yet received a certificate confirming receipt of the appeal or other documents he submitted. He added that so far he did not know the details of the procedures carried out by the Electoral Chamber following President Maduro’s controversial call for the certification of the election results.
A week ago, he called for a ballot-by-ballot recount of the July 28 election and filed charges against the five chairmen of the National Electoral Commission for allegedly plotting to change the country’s republican form.
He said the July 28 elections should have helped unite Venezuelans, but developments in the electoral process had only caused more “dissatisfaction” among the people.
«Where are the minutes? If they are recorded, why are the results not public? These belong to the Venezuelans, they are in every ballot box. “This secrecy does not help anyone,” he said.
Marquez confirmed that the law requires the results to be published because voters cannot be left defenseless.
«We who demand transparency are not complicit; we are Venezuelan citizens. «This is not a whim, but a legitimate demand for compliance with the law and thus for the preservation of peace in our country.»
[ad_2]
Source link
