[ad_1]
María Alejandra Díaz, a constitutional lawyer and member of the Popular Democratic Front, insisted on exhausting all institutional avenues to resolve the post-election crisis that the country is experiencing, “If there is a big doubt, there is material support to understand what happened. Even if the electoral college says it is unobjectionable, whether what was published is true or not.”
In an interview Cut point, He said that to begin a new period with the origin and manifestation of legitimacy, which means peace in the Republic, “the logical and legal thing to do is to compare the 30,000 minutes in the CNE.”
Diaz described different forms of minutes: digital records sent to aggregator centers, printed minutes kept in numbered envelopes, minutes signed by all actors, data retained in memory. Voting machines consist of hashing mechanisms, data recovery codes, and another element is the physical ballot.
María Alejandra Díaz, a member critical of Chavismo, said she understood that democracy was in danger and she reiterated, referring to the boxes protected by the Republican Plan, that “every vote must be counted” and that the CNE believes that the counting should be “a public event, televised and attended by journalists, witnesses from all sides, candidates, professors and experts”.
During the interview, he said “You can’t kidnap my box” and told me “the problem is solved because I’m going to sentence you”, Diaz stressed that “this is not the case, the TSJ of the Electoral Hall does not count the votes” He reiterated that “there are many legal loopholes and factual strategies that cast a shadow on the elections.”
Venezuela will face legal origin issues, which will have an impact on governance capacity
In her view, María Alejandra Díaz does not advocate “taking sides”, what is needed is “transparency, we want to know what the public opinion of Venezuelans is”.
On the other hand, he commented that there are institutional weaknesses, “there is no weight and checks and balances within the institutions, at least within the TSJ, they are elected based on the qualified majority that the government has in the National Assembly, that is, it is a second-year election.”
“This means that not all members of public power have sufficient autonomy and independence to make decisions.” María Alejandria Díaz said that if it was a constitutional decision, it would obviously be the TSJ Constitutional Council that should review the situation.
Díaz acknowledged that Venezuela faces institutional difficulties due to who makes up its institutions; however, he did not rule out the possibility of insisting that institutional avenues must be exhausted to make the country’s voice heard.
[ad_2]
Source link
