[ad_1]
The government has decided to amend the copyright collection method through legislation Songs, movies, and other types of art Copied in a private setting.
The measure also modifies what is considered “Public reproduction or performance” of music, film, theatre and literary works. Until today, the use of a work meant charging a fee, as it required authorization from the author or the entity that manages the intellectual property system.
Dictators don’t like this.
Professional and critical journalism practice is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That is why it troubles those who think they are in possession of the truth.
With the introduction of new regulations Authorization and payment are only required when the work is used in a “public access space, free of charge and for multiple people.”
“When conducted in a private setting, whether permanent or temporary, occupation is not publicly represented or performed,” the regulations detail.
“What seems like an insignificant thing is actually a very important advance. For example, it meansHotels don’t have to pay for music or movies played, which would increase room rates. This often reaches 10% of the cost of hotel services, and not only that, but in everything related to tourism,” the presidential spokesman argued today. Manuel Adoni, at his usual press conference.
Apart from“Internet” is incorporated into the new “public space” In it, authorization from the creator of a work is required to reproduce it, and therefore payment must be made for its dissemination.
On September 2, the import PAIS tax will be reduced, but the tourism industry will remain unchanged
The new Decree 765/2024 places emphasis on technology and digital media (such as various streaming platforms), which are part of daily use for a large part of the population and are relatively easy to access.
The decree also states Authors have the right to receive fair compensation from “any person who derives direct or indirect financial benefit, occasionally or permanently, from the public use of the work.” Or host an event with her.
It also explains that as long as the reproduction is of a “didactic nature” or “patriotic commemorations of official educational institutions or authorized by the state,” there is no need to pay for its use.
“One less job”, Javier Lanari in support of the measure
“We’ve normalized the fact that they tax you for playing music at private parties. In other words, they’ll shut down your birthday party for using an MP3 or CD to ‘protect copyright.'” One less job! #SADAIC”, published by Javier Lanari, Deputy Minister of Information of the Presidential Office.
The official’s response was a reference to the fact that management companies suing over the use of intellectual property could seek fees for playing music belonging to others in private homes, businesses and privately owned venues.
The Independent Musicians Union expressed concerns about the change
In response to this amendment, the Union of Independent Musicians (UMI) expressed its concerns in a statement:
“from UMI (Union of Independent Musicians) We are very concerned about Decree No. 765/2024 published today in the Official Gazette on Intellectual Property.
Not only does the decree seek to advance the management of artists’ intellectual property (a more real form of property than physical products), but its confusing wording leaves open multiple interpretations, potentially sparking protracted litigation over its resolution.
Our intellectual property rights are of a nutritional nature and we therefore ask the executive branch to immediately repeal this decree. We hold him accountable for the consequences of this irresponsibility. Regulations may result.
From UMI We will organize to reach a legal and political consensus to repeal the above decree. Released today“.
RB/DS
[ad_2]
Source link
