[ad_1]
The author of this material is Korean News. Any reproduction or partial use is permitted with the permission of the editors of K-News.
In modern football, technology plays an important role as it greatly facilitates the work of referees, helping them to make the right decisions in most cases and reduce mistakes. In this material, we will discuss how modern technology works for football referees, what technologies are used in this sport.
used to be
The most famous technological innovation in football is the VAR video replay system, which was first introduced at a major international tournament during the World Cup in Russia. Now VAR systems are everywhere.
At the bookmaker’s office Mostbet https://mostbete.kz Today, you can even bet on whether VAR will be used in the upcoming football matches. When placing a bet, the user must take into account that bookmakers do not consider the use of VAR in all cases when the video assistant is watching one of the episodes during the match. But only in cases where they turn to the main arbiter and invite him to the screen to make the final decision.
Today, VAR is used in football matches to determine goals, offside positions, penalty kicks and sending off players. It is worth noting that under the current protocol, in other cases, the video assistant does not have the right to contact the referee, even if they see that they have committed an obvious violation. For example, a yellow card is shown for violating the rules. Only in cases involving a red card does the on-field referee have the right to use VAR. This is done so that football matches do not drag on too long.
The decision on video review is made solely by the referee. Coaches do not have the right to request a video review, such as in basketball or volleyball. In these disciplines, each instructor has two unsuccessful video review attempts. This means that if after a video review it is found that the referee did make a mistake and made the wrong decision, the attempt does not expire and can be repeated.
Offside line
When determining offside situations, today’s video assistants do not use video reviews. Instead, special software is activated that simulates the situation on the football field based on the received video images and draws the offside line, instantly showing which player was closer to the goal at the time of the last pass.
Under the current rules, an attacking player is deemed offside when any part of his body is closer to the opposing goal at the time of the last pass. Thanks to the offside line, the smallest details can be seen that the judges would most likely not notice when using video review in normal circumstances. For example, an offside position is determined when a player’s fingers or nose are closer to the goal.
This is one of the reasons why the system has been criticized. It does not seem reasonable to abolish it. But perhaps soon, the rules for recording offside will change. Wenger, who is currently the head of FIFA’s football development department and was the head coach of Arsenal in London for many years, suggested that offside positions should be determined only when the entire body of the attacking player is closer to the goal. This would make the referee’s job easier and make football more interesting, as there would be more potentially dangerous one-on-one situations between attackers and goalkeepers.
Automatic goal recording system
This technology allows you to accurately determine whether a goal has been scored. To this end, multiple micro cameras are installed on the goal to accurately help determine whether the ball has completely crossed the goal line.
With such a system, the referee automatically receives a signal when the ball crosses the goal line. You no longer need to rely on your eyesight or even check the VAR cameras, as the automatic goal location system works automatically.
What mistakes of the past can modern technology avoid?
If technology had been used earlier, there would be no debate now about Geoffrey Hurst’s fair goal in the World Cup final. In the 1966 tournament, England played Germany for the gold medal. The regular season ended in a 2-2 draw. In extra time, Hurst’s shot towards the West German goal went over the crossbar behind the goalkeeper. The referee, standing away from the scene, counted the goal after being prompted by Soviet linesman Tofik Bahramov.
As a result, Hurst scored another goal and the British team won 4:2. The debate about whether Hurst’s goal was a goal continues to this day. The live video broadcast at the time did not allow us to give a clear answer to this question. Of course, Bakhramov could not be sure of his decision. The automatic goal recording system can solve this problem.
Record Football and technology: the application of modern refereeing methods First appearance Korean News.
[ad_2]
Source link
