Broadcast United

Editorial: The opacity of the European Parliament

Broadcast United News Desk
Editorial: The opacity of the European Parliament

[ad_1]

The Ministry of Public Education (MEP) adheres to a policy of confidentiality and, in the best case, Post The delivery of reports needed to assess student learning and, in turn, portfolio work. Even the information needed to review the education performance assessment system (which has been rightly criticised) is not timely and complete.

Two and a half months after the request was made, the prestigious State of Education project has yet to receive key information to produce its tenth edition. With such extensive experience, the report’s researchers are well aware of the time it takes authorities to respond to their requests for information and have found no precedent for the current delay.

In late July, Rosaura Méndez, a liberal member of parliament on the education committee, asked the European Parliament to hand over the data, but her call was ineffective. nation On 19 August, he inquired about the delivery date of the requested information but received no response.

This is clear public information on the results of national standardized tests and the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) diagnostic test to be conducted in 2022. For the former, the Ministry of Environmental Protection It took six months When the results were made public, they caused a wave of doubts.

The symbology to which the results are converted to colors Traffic Lights Students are divided into three levels: beginner, intermediate, and advanced. From this simplification, it is impossible to know the learning outcomes achieved by students, especially because the MEP does not provide clear definitions for each category.

and study UNESCO found in 2019 that 46% of Costa Rican children did not achieve the minimum acceptable learning outcomes in reading by the end of primary school. For example, with the MEP traffic lights, we have no way of knowing whether students at the basic level have adequately mastered the skills tested at that time, or whether intermediate (or yellow) means good, but not good enough.

The state has a right to this information and a right to its timely transmission to the academic community to advance research, analysis and debate. It makes no sense to insist on delaying the delivery of data that is crucial to assessing the performance of students and the Ministry of Education itself. One can only suspect that the authorities fear being criticized for unflattering results.

Nowhere is this skepticism more supported than in the technical training program announced after the break with the Omar Dengo Foundation and the derailment of the National Education Informatics Program, which had been successfully implemented for three decades. To be precise, the eighth report on the state of education, released in 2022, commend The results of the program and its contribution to digital skills training for teachers, without which “the situation in the country would have been appalling”.

The sharp contrast between these results and the fact that technical training programs are little known except for the difficulties in starting up may be the reason why the Ministry of Education requires data to be kept in specific areas of educational computing. However, the information collected by the Ministry of Environmental Protection is not yours. It belongs to the state and must be made available to anyone who needs it, whether it is a media organization or a specialized academic project.

By writing about education on the cover of the latest State of Education Report, and by not putting emphasis on it, the researchers are sending a message about the crisis in an area that is vital to human development.

[ad_2]

Source link

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *