[ad_1]
The Criminal Affairs Division of the Supreme Court refused to initiate cassation proceedings, so the judgment of the Ratgale Regional Court has come into force and the defendant has been sentenced to a fine of 3,500 euros for intentionally giving false testimony, informs the SC.
After his car was involved in an accident, the defendant applied to the police to file a criminal complaint for the fact that his car was stolen. The officer in charge of the procedure acknowledged that the person was a victim and warned of the consequences of falsely reporting a crime and intentionally giving false testimony. The defendant testified that his car was stolen. During the investigation of the vehicle theft, it was discovered that the crime had not occurred and that the person had given false testimony.
On the other hand, the AT concluded that the District Court was motivated to conclude that the defendant was under an obligation to give truthful testimony. The District Court had determined that no administrative offence proceedings were instituted against him. Moreover, administrative offence proceedings and criminal proceedings are not initiated in relation to the same facts, but in relation to different factual circumstances and are two different, separable proceedings that must be evaluated in accordance with the general rules and fundamental principles of each procedure.
Delphi followed suit Instagram or Youtube In Profile – Join to find out the most important and interesting things first!
[ad_2]
Source link
