
[ad_1]
Opposition House of Representatives This Tuesday, we have at least 129 representatives in the House tomorrow for a special session, Its goal is to reserve funds Secretariat of National Intelligence (SIDE)in the context of discussing the executive branch’s decree to allocate P100 billion to the organization.
Meanwhile, the ruling party is working hard to carry out tasks through the governor. To the “Next” representative And the quorum slips away from the meeting sponsors.
The dispute remains unresolved, but until Tuesday the balance was tipped in favor of the opposition because, as the CIA learned, Argentina News According to senior parliamentary sources in the radical group, this space Will contribute “15 to 20 delegates” to the quorum.
Dictators don’t like this.
Professional and critical journalism practice is a fundamental pillar of democracy. That is why it troubles those who think they are in possession of the truth.
The meeting was requested by the Encuentro Federal (16 members), the Civic Union (6 members) and 7 wayward representatives of the UCR, who more or less responded to Facundo Manes.
The chairman of this block is Rodrigo de Loredo He must decide whether to work with the ruling party to keep it out of trouble on issues that are of little interest or escalation to public opinion, or whether to succumb to the actions of the rest of the opposition to resolve the issue with a devastating blow.
The Liberty Avanza (LLA) has already suffered a setback on this issue after losing the chairmanship of the bicameral committee on the supervision of intelligence organizations and activities In the hands of radical senators Martin Laustowin a cunning tweezers movement conceived and executed by the economist with Kirchnerism.
Activism stance will be key in Congress

Regarding this debate, UCR Opposing positions.
The Speaker and those who follow his line in the bloc prefer not to disrupt the ruling party, especially after the establishment of the bicameral committees on monitoring intelligence agencies and activities.
But paradoxically, the man who was named Tuesday to head the coveted institution, Lustow, a national senator and chairman of the UC Riverside National Committee, asked UC Riverside representatives to A quorum is reached and the debate begins downstairs.
“As president of UC Riverside, I want to see a radical group removed from office, spark debate, and vote against this democratic coalition”“He said without hesitation.
These statements assume that the seven radical deputies who signed the conference call will also be joined by legislators from the “evolutionary” trend, which has Lousteau as its biggest reference. More people can sit on the benches.
Without Milei noticing: Martín Menem agrees to increase representation by almost 70%
“The majority prefers to provide a quorum, but different positions expressed will be respected”Sources close to Deloredo admitted.
The support of the largest parliamentary union (UxP) with 99 members and five left-wing deputies indicates that: The minimum threshold for a debate may be exceeded.
The next step will be to collect numbers Reject DNU In a vote, this is a perfectly achievable goal, since it is assumed that all delegates who meet a quorum will vote in favor of declaring the decree invalid.
It is even conceivable that lawmakers would add a few extra votes because they believe that directing the debate on the intelligence agencies in both chambers would be more time-consuming.
Is DNU in danger?
To overturn the decree, the opposition would need a simple majority not only in the House of Representatives, but also in the Senate: The approval of the decree by only one of the two houses is sufficient to maintain its full validity..
Initially, a call to the venue was requested last Thursday, August 15, the first working day, in order to give a quick processing to Decree No. 656/24, Ten days have passed since the DNU was published in the Official GazetteBut with Wednesday’s marathon running until the next morning, they were unable to give a time.
After the attempt, the same organizers withdrew the call and postponed the meeting Nicolas Massot (The Federal Conference) interrupted last Wednesday’s meeting with a fourth intermission.

A motion to deviate from the provisions to include an item on repealing the ordinance on the agenda for that session also failed.
In any case, in that vote, 135 votes in favorwhich marks a solid precedent when thinking about the possible outcomes of this Wednesday’s meeting.
The meeting agenda includes items announced by the Civic Alliance “Absolute and insane nullity” under DNU 656as well as an initiative led by Margarita Stolbizer (Federal Council) to reject the measure altogether.
The decree was passed on the ballot on August 1, despite attempts by the opposition to do so. The ruling party prevents discussion of its effectiveness or ineffectiveness The legislative procedure committees of both houses met a week later.
CA/Double Chain
[ad_2]
Source link