Collecting – Syrian Steps

Series of steps

Journalist Mad Issa writes:

It will be necessary for the next government to decide on the issue of providing services to citizens, whether to continue to provide services or to entrust the private sector to assume the role of organizer, monitor and overseer.

The government now provides services that are not up to the standard of once every 20 days or once a month, water is not a service, the situation of equipment stopping and material loss in hospitals is unlivable. Despite the importance of what the cadres of the department have proposed and done, the cellular network does not take the form of service, but of sniping, as they charge high fees for the worst services, and this problem can be summarized.
Today, the cleaner, when you reward him out of appreciation for what he has done, he knocks on your door the next day and asks if you have any “rubbish” for him to take away, which means he has. This situation can be applied to all services, asking the service provider “Government” whether it will continue to play the role of service provider or hand it over to the private sector and take on the role of regulator and organizer? .
In order to successfully serve the private sector, it is unreasonable for the government to require a private entity to provide a specific service and demand that its share of revenue be the same as if the public entity provided that service. The investor’s share must be reasonable and proportional to what is provided, and that it provides adequate infrastructure and employment opportunities, and that its services are good and reasonably priced. Using the excuse of increasing the resources of the treasury means that citizens will pay more for services than citizens of any other country.
When the collector’s mind controls the service provider, the service will be the worst and the price will be the highest. This is the situation we have today. When you go back to inquire about the service, you will not find the answer from the employee because of his financial situation and the situation of the organization, which leads to poor quality of service.
The compulsory payment of quasi-services has made the relationship between service providers, citizens and employees very bad. The debate must be resolved and a decision must be made whether the government should continue to provide services directly or indirectly through private individuals. In a good way and at an appropriate price, the government will organize and supervise, through which it will get an acceptable return and provide it. It must restore the infrastructure, provide jobs, get rid of the curse of citizens, and take responsibility for all the exploitative and tyrannical environment, mistakes and systems.
Agencies and companies that lose more than 50% of their employees for various reasons without compensation may be an incentive, assistance or hidden intention to switch to indirect services.