Broadcast United

Cocktail case: Judiciary to decide whether to exclude lawyer Arsenio Olay from oral trial

Broadcast United News Desk
Cocktail case: Judiciary to decide whether to exclude lawyer Arsenio Olay from oral trial

[ad_1]

he judicial A decision will be made on Monday, August 19, on whether to exclude the lawyer from the oral trial in the cocktail case. Arsenio Olay Responding to the Court’s Decision Constitutional Court Repealed all actions taken by the agency Prosecutor’s Office He was charged with obstruction of justice.

At a virtual hearing at 9:00 a.m. The Third National Collegiate Criminal Court will announce its decision on a request filed by attorney Percy Cavero Prayer Guardso that his sponsor was removed from this oral trial.

In response, prosecutor José Domingo Perez Gomez did not object to the lawyers’ request for legal defense. Arsenio Olay.

The country’s Third Collegiate Criminal Court must also rule on a request by lawyers for People Power leader Keiko Fujimori and other defendants to set aside everything achieved so far in this oral trial following the Constitutional Court’s ruling.

TC ruling

The Constitutional Court annulled the tax clause that refused to exclude prosecutor José Domingo Perez Gomez Criminal proceedings against lawyer Arsenio Oré for alleged obstruction of justice Case Cocktailrelated to donations made in 2011 and 2016 to the presidential campaigns of People Power leader Keiko Fujimori.

The Supreme Interpreter of our Magna Carta adopted the measure, declaring that “by majority” the request for protection filed by lawyer Ole Guardia to annul the regulation issued by the Coordinator of the Special Task Forces of the Odebrecht case and Operation Car Wash of the Public Prosecutor’s Office, Rafael Vela, who announced on January 7, 2019, that the request filed by this lawyer to exclude prosecutor Perez Gómez from the criminal proceedings was without basis.

The Constitutional Court also declared all tax bills resulting from the above-mentioned repealed tax provisions “invalid.”

The Supreme Interpreter of our Magna Carta commands the responsible High Attorney to issue new tax provisions in accordance with the considerations expressed in the ruling he issued on this request for protection.

[ad_2]

Source link

Share This Article
Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *