[ad_1]
Damascus – Special – Seriastipes :
Economist Ammar Youssef believes that partnerships are a good, regular and acceptable situation for situations like ours, and emphasizes that partnerships can succeed according to the principles on which they are based, namely the participation between the private and public sectors, but Youssef does not support its application in public sector institutions and companies, as he said: “In principle, the experiment failed from the beginning because the government did not improve its application, felt superior to the private sector, so it restricted it and added conditions, but the private sector did not participate in it in the desired way.
From here, Yusuf argues: there is a way the public sector can take, which is to simply activate it, that is, to activate the public sector? Recalling that the public sector is the factor that “weakens” the state during the crisis, as he says, the public sector has capabilities, means of production, assets, exemptions and privileges, and therefore, these are advantages. The public sector can transform participatory action into a new mentality through effective management, good wages and mastery of implementing development plans, and realize in practice the possibility of providing wages that match or exceed those of the people. The private sector will wait for progress, even in the case of partnerships, which will be its position stronger?
He added in a statement to Syriasteps: “Whoever says that the government cannot push the public sector and is not capable of doing so, I assure him that there are enough funds in the state budget and treasury to get out of all the stagnation and difficulties. The government believes that the public sector can but is unwilling to work with the mentality of the private sector, especially in the executive branch.”
Dr. Amar Yusuf gave an important example to prove his remarks: the Military Housing which was managed with the mentality of a private sector public facility in the eighties of the last century, and what destroyed this huge institution, and today it could have been an important sector in the process of reconstruction, which is being managed with the mentality of the public sector, recalling how the Military Housing Corporation was able to successfully implement major and huge projects at a certain stage because it cooperated with the mentality of the private sector, but unfortunately when it was expropriated with the mentality of the public sector, it reached what it is today, and it should have been a strong, important, controlling entity of the state in many strategic projects, and what do we need today as an institution?
Dr. Amar Yusuf: The stated objective of the partnership issues raised during the crisis was to restart and revive the stalled and crumbling projects and plants in the state, to revive them and inject liquidity into them, while in fact the real objective was to seek the sale of public institutions to the private sector, as was made clear in the laws enacted before the problems were rectified?
Thus, economic expert Amar Yusuf says: The problem with participatory law is the way the law is actually applied, which is far from a realistic basis and fails to attract private funding and hopes… because its preconditions are imposed by the government and involve a lot of unfairness and interference.
Economists put it bluntly: arrogance and a closed management style have destroyed the public sector, and if we don’t overcome this we have no hope of restoring the public sector or participation itself.
Dr. Youssef stressed: Activating partnerships and private-led national projects requires the same conditions as attracting investment and private capital, from providing energy carriers to stabilizing and stabilizing exchange rates. Whatever the price, we are working to ensure its stability in the long term. If it is cooperation with people outside Syria, then we need to provide clear and reliable mechanisms for the flow of funds in and out.
Furthermore, partnerships, like investments, require fair judicial procedures, so any dispute or disagreement must have recourse to a fair and competent judiciary, so the factors that attract partners from private to public need to be the same as the environment that attracts investors to build projects for them in Syria, so when we succeed in providing… establishing a mature, flexible, unrestricted investment environment that meets the conditions of governance and transparency, it will not be difficult to attract private funds to participate in the public sector, and it will be difficult to attract capital to invest in Syria?
The government insists that attracting partners and investors with imperfect laws and environment will not produce any mature results and will not achieve any goals. Those countries that have successfully achieved economic and social progress are those that have the ability to develop laws, plans and a perfect working environment?
| Share via comments: |
[ad_2]
Source link
