[ad_1]
Kinshasa, Paris, Brussels.
Le Soft International n°1558 | Monday, August 8, 2022.
On December 13, 1997, the US Secretary of State, Ms. Madeleine Kerber Albright, visited Congo. She was on a tour of seven African countries, and Kinshasa was one of her stops. The general speech to the African elite was about the new partnership that the United States of America wanted to develop with the African continent. Madeleine Albright spoke about human rights and, of course, about the change of power on the African continent, and she advocated replacing the “bullet” (ball) with the “ballot” (ballot box).
To appease the hearts of the former Zairians who had just escaped from thirty-two years of Mobutu’s dictatorship, she welcomed Mobutu’s departure and pledged tens of millions of dollars.
At the time, the cost of rebuilding the country was estimated at $9 billion. But the US Secretary of State had a message for the country’s president, Laurent-Désiré Kabila. He challenged the regime publicly and formally, demanding a political opening to the opposition.
The visit took place against the backdrop of a UN investigation into the massacres of hundreds of thousands of Rwandan Hutus during the advance of the Democratic Alliance led by Laurent-Désiré Kabila. The regime was able to successfully block the investigation thanks to the Americans who accompanied them, or at least the Americans who accompanied the Tutsi leadership during their conquest of the West. Obviously, in front of his mentor, Mzee’s position is as fragile as that of Bizimungu in Rwanda, who ascended to the presidency of Rwanda without being a strongman! In addition to being docile…
A few months later, on August 2, 1998, the United States closed its embassy in Kinshasa. What some called “Africa’s First World War” had begun.
At the time, Susan Rice, who later served as U.S. ambassador to the United Nations during the Obama administration, served on Clinton’s team as undersecretary of state for African affairs.
She played a major role in the courageous parachuting into Kitona and seizing Kinshasa within two months in order to achieve regime change there through weapons (bullets) rather than ballot boxes (votes).
The Mzee regime may have promised to hold elections (ballot papers) in 1999, but the military option, although risky, was taken off the table.
However, the experience of the tragic events in Rwanda in 1994 should have served as a reminder of caution. “Niet,” Mzee would hang up on Madeleine Albright, who was lecturing him with an injunction.
The people of Kinshasa were filled with horror at the events that took place in August 1998, when the six million inhabitants went through days of suffering. But this was only the beginning of the dehumanization of the Congolese people on the border between Rwanda and Uganda.
We share a common humanity.
President Laurent Kabila allegedly responded undiplomatically to Madeleine Albright’s ban on him by telling him: “We will have to wait for the next generation, not me!” Since then, another generation has come to power in Kinshasa, driven by pro-Western figures.
On the other side of the Atlantic, the Democrats returned to power after two Republican terms under George W. Bush. Barack Obama brought fresh blood to the Washington establishment, and his speeches aroused almost messianic expectations around the world.
There has never been a candidate for the White House who has such extensive knowledge and such a great interest in the Congolese cause. On his blog we can read his vision of the policies that his administration should implement:
“End the conflict in Congo. Senator Obama revised U.S. policy toward Congo to include commitments to help the country rebuild, build lasting political structures, hold destabilizing foreign governments accountable, crack down on corrupt politicians, and professionalize the military.
The bill also authorizes $52 million in U.S. aid to Congo, requires the U.S. to send a special envoy to address ongoing violence and urges the government to strengthen U.N. peacekeeping forces.
Senator Obama overhauled U.S. policy toward the Congo, including:
(1) committed to helping rebuild the country,
(2) developing sustainable political structures,
(3) hold accountable foreign governments that undermine national stability;
(iv) combating corrupt politicians;
(V) Professionalization of the military; He appealed;
(6) Ask the U.S. Special Envoy to address the ongoing violence and urge the U.S. government to strengthen the UN peacekeeping force.
Devlin, who was the head of the CIA’s Leopoldville bureau in 1960, admitted before his death (December 2008) that he had received orders from Washington to organize the physical elimination of Lumumba, the prime minister of the emerging democracy in the heart of the continent. Allan Dule, deputy director of the CIA, explained his motives as follows: “He has the qualities to become the Fidel Castro of Africa.”
At the time, in the Western media, the official version of the drama told of a struggle among Congolese factions for control of the young country. This was a cover-up. If Russia was present at the Berlin Conference, where European imperial multinationals established trade freedom in the Congo Basin, it was not present in the international race for plunder that ensued.
This belated interest was justified by the new need for strategic minerals, which had become a powerful country thanks to the creation of the Soviet Union and entered the Congo after the decolonization of Africa.
Laurent-Désiré Kabila was assassinated on January 16, 2001, just a few days before the Clinton team left the White House, which had just given way to George W. Bush. The new team was less harsh on Congo, but still continued Clinton’s policies. The new US president made it clear that he wanted to review Washington’s policy towards Congo in recent years, which had triggered the worst war since World War II!
The rapes in Congo are the result of wars waged by Western companies to obtain strategic minerals, and these companies behave like true white-collar terrorists in these countries. Otherwise, why would we only condemn abuses in coveted areas? It is very likely that representatives of these corporate associations will be present in Mrs. Clinton’s delegation.
In an effort to end the Congo War, President Barack Obama has called on countries that have destabilized Congo to be held accountable for this silent massacre.
However, the presence of American soldiers and training camps in Rwanda ties the country to the United States as one of the countries that are destabilizing Congo.
During her visit to Kinshasa, Mrs. Hillary Clinton will make a few words about the corruption that is corroding the Congolese public sphere and hindering any coordinated action that could generate internal synergies, with the construction of a strong and prosperous country at the core of “Africa”.
This goes back to the Mobutu era and we know how this political class was created and established by the West, which will come to the rescue if necessary and bully those who want better.
If Hillary Clinton reread the notes of Madeleine Albright’s official speech to Laurent-Désiré Kabila in December 1997 and made some changes, she could repeat it to her son Kabila a few days later, between Mrs. Albright’s death and Kabila’s death. Mrs. Clinton, America has not delivered on its promises.
Madeleine Albright spoke of democracy, of replacing the “bullet” with the “ballot.”
Without political masters, without long-term vision in terms of infrastructure, without anything to guarantee the protection of the people and their interests, Europe’s existence is limited to the extraction of resources.
Congo Forum
Lesoft International, N°1447 | Wednesday, March 13, 2019.
[ad_2]
Source link
