[ad_1]
The answer is Loten Lindblom Signed Submission by Anna Hagstrom It misses the core of Hagstrom’s argument, which is the importance of family reunification and the human impact of today’s visa policies.
Concerns about medical costs are understandable, and welcoming relatives is conditional on that person having comprehensive health insurance. But this must not overshadow the fundamental right to visit loved ones. The assumption that all visitors from countries like Syria will stay to seek asylum is too general and does not take into account those who genuinely just want to be reunited with their families.
We will not forget Our countries’ actions, such as economic sanctions and arms exports, have exacerbated instability in the Middle East. The central question is why our governments continue to support policies that exacerbate the situation in these countries.
If the goal is to prevent immigration to Sweden, we should work to create stability and improve conditions in the region, not support measures that lead to instability.
More information about the committer: This is how you write on submitter and reply
More committers: dn.se/insandare
Letter to the Editor.August 22, 2024
[ad_2]
Source link
